Benchmark dose risk analysis with mixed-factor quantal data in environmental risk assessment

被引:1
作者
Sans-Fuentes, Maria A. [1 ,2 ]
Piegorsch, Walter W. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Inst BIO5, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[2] Univ Arizona, Grad Interdisciplinary Program Stat & Data Sci, Tucson, AZ USA
[3] Univ Arizona, Dept Math, Inst BIO5, Tucson, AZ USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
benchmark analysis; BMDL; lower confidence limits; quantal response data; quantitative risk assessment; simultaneous inferences; MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD-ESTIMATION; SIMPLE INDEPENDENT ACTION; MODEL SELECTION; OPTIMAL DESIGNS; REGRESSION; EXPOSURE; BIVARIATE; PROFILES;
D O I
10.1002/env.2677
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Benchmark analysis is a general risk estimation strategy for identifying the benchmark dose (BMD) past which the risk of exhibiting an adverse environmental response exceeds a fixed, target value of benchmark response. Estimation of BMD and of its lower confidence limit (BMDL) is well understood for the case of an adverse response to a single stimulus. In many environmental settings, however, one or more additional, secondary, qualitative factor(s) may collude to affect the adverse outcome, such that the risk changes with differential levels of the secondary factor. This article extends the single-dose BMD paradigm to a mixed-factor setting with a secondary qualitative factor possessing two levels. With focus on quantal-response data and using a generalized linear model with a complementary-log link function, we derive expressions for BMD and BMDL. We study the operating characteristics of six different multiplicity-adjusted approaches to calculate the BMDL, using Monte Carlo evaluations. We illustrate the calculations via an example dataset from environmental carcinogenicity testing.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2002, ENCY ENV
[2]   SOME TAUTOLOGOUS ASPECTS OF THE COMPARISON OF CARCINOGENIC POTENCY IN RATS AND MICE [J].
BERNSTEIN, L ;
GOLD, LS ;
AMES, BN ;
PIKE, MC ;
HOEL, DG .
FUNDAMENTAL AND APPLIED TOXICOLOGY, 1985, 5 (01) :79-86
[3]  
Boone E.L., 2015, INT J ENVI STAT, V7, P1
[4]   Convex mixture regression for quantitative risk assessment [J].
Canale, Antonio ;
Durante, Daniele ;
Dunson, David B. .
BIOMETRICS, 2018, 74 (04) :1331-1340
[5]   CALCULATION OF BENCHMARK DOSES FROM CONTINUOUS DATA [J].
CRUMP, KS .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1995, 15 (01) :79-89
[6]   A NEW METHOD FOR DETERMINING ALLOWABLE DAILY INTAKES [J].
CRUMP, KS .
FUNDAMENTAL AND APPLIED TOXICOLOGY, 1984, 4 (05) :854-871
[7]   Benchmark dose profiles for joint-action continuous data in quantitative risk assessment [J].
Deutsch, Roland C. ;
Piegorsch, Walter W. .
BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 55 (05) :741-754
[8]  
Deutsch RC, 2010, ADV APPL STAT, V14, P101
[9]   Benchmark Dose Profiles for Joint-Action Quantal Data in Quantitative Risk Assessment [J].
Deutsch, Roland C. ;
Piegorsch, Walter W. .
BIOMETRICS, 2012, 68 (04) :1313-1322
[10]   CALCULATION OF UNIVARIATE AND BIVARIATE NORMAL PROBABILITY FUNCTIONS [J].
DIVGI, DR .
ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 1979, 7 (04) :903-910