Structural Equation Model Averaging: Methodology and Application

被引:13
作者
Seng, Loraine [1 ]
Li, Jialiang [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Stat & Appl Probabil, Singapore 117546, Singapore
关键词
2-Stage least squares; High-dimensional instrumental variables; Model average; Structural equation model; Weak instrumental variable;
D O I
10.1080/07350015.2020.1870479
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The instrumental variable (IV) methods are attractive since they can lead to a consistent answer to the main question in causal modeling, that is, the estimation of average causal effect of an exposure on the outcome in the presence of unmeasured confounding. However, it is now acknowledged in the literature that using weak IVs might not suit the inference goal satisfactorily. We consider the problem of estimating causal effects in an observational study in this article, allowing some IVs to be weak. In many modern learning jobs, we may face a large number of instruments and their quality could range from poor to strong. To incorporate them in a 2-stage least squares estimation procedure, we consider a model averaging technique. The proposed methods only involve a few layers of least squares estimation with closed-form solutions and thus is easy to implement in practice. Theoretical properties are carefully established, including the consistency and asymptotic normality of the estimated causal parameter. Numerical studies are carried out to assess the performance in low- and high-dimensional settings and comparisons are made between our proposed method and a wide range of existing alternative methods. A real data example on home price is analyzed to illustrate our methodology.
引用
收藏
页码:815 / 828
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Aggrist J., 1995, J BUS EC STAT, V13, P225
  • [2] A different paradigm for the initial colonisation of Sahul
    Allen, Jim
    O'Connell, James F.
    [J]. ARCHAEOLOGY IN OCEANIA, 2020, 55 (01) : 1 - 14
  • [3] Building a Stronger Instrument in an Observational Study of Perinatal Care for Premature Infants
    Baiocchi, Mike
    Small, Dylan S.
    Lorch, Scott
    Rosenbaum, Paul R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 105 (492) : 1285 - 1296
  • [4] Sparse Models and Methods for Optimal Instruments With an Application to Eminent Domain
    Belloni, A.
    Chen, D.
    Chernozhukov, V.
    Hansen, C.
    [J]. ECONOMETRICA, 2012, 80 (06) : 2369 - 2429
  • [5] High-Dimensional Methods and Inference on Structural and Treatment Effects
    Belloni, Alexandre
    Chernozhukov, Victor
    Hansen, Christian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2014, 28 (02) : 29 - 50
  • [6] PROBLEMS WITH INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLES ESTIMATION WHEN THE CORRELATION BETWEEN THE INSTRUMENTS AND THE ENDOGENOUS EXPLANATORY VARIABLE IS WEAK
    BOUND, J
    JAEGER, DA
    BAKER, RM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1995, 90 (430) : 443 - 450
  • [7] Model selection: An integral part of inference
    Buckland, ST
    Burnham, KP
    Augustin, NH
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 1997, 53 (02) : 603 - 618
  • [8] Modal-based estimation via heterogeneity-penalized weighting: model averaging for consistent and efficient estimation in Mendelian randomization when a plurality of candidate instruments are valid
    Burgess, Stephen
    Zuber, Verena
    Gkatzionis, Apostolos
    Foley, Christopher N.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2018, 47 (04) : 1242 - 1254
  • [9] Caner M., 2010, The adaptive lasso method for instrumental variable selection
  • [10] Chen D., 2012, GROWTH SHADOW EXPROP