Research on optimal benchmark price of tradable green certificate based on system dynamics: A China perspective

被引:62
作者
Zhao, Xin-gang [1 ,2 ]
Zhou, Ying [1 ,2 ]
Zuo, Yi [1 ,2 ]
Meng, Jin [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Yu-zhuo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] North China Elect Power Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] North China Elect Power Univ, Beijing Key Lab New Energy & Low Carbon Dev, Beijing 102206, Peoples R China
关键词
Renewable portfolio standard; Tradable green certificate; Benchmark price; Social welfare; China; FEED-IN TARIFF; RESIDENTIAL ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION; RENEWABLE PORTFOLIO STANDARD; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; POWER-GENERATION; MARKET; INDUSTRY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.408
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Renewable portfolio standard (RPS) is a compulsory institutional change to achieve low-carbon energy transformation in China. Its success depends on the scientific system quasi-parameter design, the most important system quasi-parameter is the benchmark price of the tradable green certificate (TGC). Setting the benchmark price of TGC scientifically and reasonably in line with China's national conditions is conducive to the effective implementation of RPS in China. Based on the system dynamics (SD) to construct China's green certificate trading market model, this paper analyzes the interaction between the TGC market and the electricity market under the RPS, and uses Vensim simulation to simulate the optimal TGC benchmark price based on the maximization of social welfare. The results show that the TGC market and the electricity market are mutually influential. As the benchmark price of TGC increases, the total power generation increases and the on-grid price decreases. Consumer surplus, producer surplus and social welfare all reach the maximum when the TGC benchmark price is 0.4yuan/KWh, so determines 0.4yuan/kWh as the optimal benchmark price of TGC. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:241 / 252
页数:12
相关论文
共 44 条
[31]   Designing an emissions trading scheme for China with a dynamic computable general equilibrium model [J].
Tang, Ling ;
Shi, Jiarui ;
Bao, Qin .
ENERGY POLICY, 2016, 97 :507-520
[32]   Impacts of a common green certificate market on electricity and CO2-emission markets in the Nordic countries [J].
Unger, T ;
Ahgren, EO .
ENERGY POLICY, 2005, 33 (16) :2152-2163
[33]  
Vogstad K.O., 2005, P 38 ANN HAW INT C S, DOI [10.1109/hicss.2005.152, DOI 10.1109/HICSS.2005.152]
[34]   Green certificates market in Poland - The sources of crisis [J].
Wedzik, Andrzej ;
Siewierski, Tomasz ;
Szypowski, Michal .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 75 :490-503
[35]   A real options valuation of Chinese wind energy technologies for power generation: do benefits from the feed-in tariffs outweigh costs? [J].
Wesseh, Presley K., Jr. ;
Lin, Boqiang .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 112 :1591-1599
[36]  
[吴力波 Wu Libo], 2015, [中国人口·资源与环境, China Population Resources and Environment], V25, P53
[37]   Policies and economic efficiency of China's distributed photovoltaic and energy storage industry [J].
Yang, Fei-fei ;
Zhao, Xin-gang .
ENERGY, 2018, 154 :221-230
[38]   Do state renewable portfolio standards promote in-state renewable generation? [J].
Yin, Haitao ;
Powers, Nicholas .
ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (02) :1140-1149
[39]   Optimal feed-in tariff for solar photovoltaic power generation in China: A real options analysis [J].
Zhang, M. M. ;
Zhou, D. Q. ;
Zhou, P. ;
Liu, G. Q. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2016, 97 :181-192
[40]   The development of China's biomass power industry under feed-in tariff and renewable portfolio standard: A system dynamics analysis [J].
Zhang Yu-zhuo ;
Zhao Xin-gang ;
Ren Ling-zhi ;
Liang Ji ;
Liu Ping-kuo .
ENERGY, 2017, 139 :947-961