Research on optimal benchmark price of tradable green certificate based on system dynamics: A China perspective

被引:62
作者
Zhao, Xin-gang [1 ,2 ]
Zhou, Ying [1 ,2 ]
Zuo, Yi [1 ,2 ]
Meng, Jin [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Yu-zhuo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] North China Elect Power Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] North China Elect Power Univ, Beijing Key Lab New Energy & Low Carbon Dev, Beijing 102206, Peoples R China
关键词
Renewable portfolio standard; Tradable green certificate; Benchmark price; Social welfare; China; FEED-IN TARIFF; RESIDENTIAL ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION; RENEWABLE PORTFOLIO STANDARD; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; POWER-GENERATION; MARKET; INDUSTRY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.408
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Renewable portfolio standard (RPS) is a compulsory institutional change to achieve low-carbon energy transformation in China. Its success depends on the scientific system quasi-parameter design, the most important system quasi-parameter is the benchmark price of the tradable green certificate (TGC). Setting the benchmark price of TGC scientifically and reasonably in line with China's national conditions is conducive to the effective implementation of RPS in China. Based on the system dynamics (SD) to construct China's green certificate trading market model, this paper analyzes the interaction between the TGC market and the electricity market under the RPS, and uses Vensim simulation to simulate the optimal TGC benchmark price based on the maximization of social welfare. The results show that the TGC market and the electricity market are mutually influential. As the benchmark price of TGC increases, the total power generation increases and the on-grid price decreases. Consumer surplus, producer surplus and social welfare all reach the maximum when the TGC benchmark price is 0.4yuan/KWh, so determines 0.4yuan/kWh as the optimal benchmark price of TGC. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:241 / 252
页数:12
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Price volatility and banking in Green Certificate markets [J].
Amundsen, Eirik S. ;
Baldursson, Fridrik M. ;
Mortensen, Jorgen Birk .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2006, 35 (04) :259-287
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Official Journal of European Union, VL140, P16
[3]  
Brian Lips, 2018, CREDIT MULTIPLIERS R, V4
[4]   THE GREENHOUSE-EFFECT - THE FALLACIES IN THE ENERGY EFFICIENCY SOLUTION [J].
BROOKES, L .
ENERGY POLICY, 1990, 18 (02) :199-201
[5]   Exploring utility organization electricity generation, residential electricity consumption, and energy efficiency: A climatic approach [J].
Craig, Christopher A. ;
Feng, Song .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2017, 185 :779-790
[6]   When outcomes are the reflection of the analysis criteria: A review of the tradable green certificate assessments [J].
Darmani, Anna ;
Rickne, Annika ;
Hidalgo, Antonio ;
Arvidsson, Niklas .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 62 :372-381
[7]   Developing a framework for renewable technology portfolio selection: A case study at a R&D center [J].
Davoudpour, Hamid ;
Rezaee, Sara ;
Ashrafi, Maryam .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2012, 16 (06) :4291-4297
[8]   Feed-in tariff vs. renewable portfolio standard: An empirical test of their relative effectiveness in promoting wind capacity development [J].
Dong, C. G. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2012, 42 :476-485
[9]   Residential electricity consumption after the reform of tiered pricing for household electricity in China [J].
Du, Gang ;
Lin, Wei ;
Sun, Chuanwang ;
Zhang, Dingzhong .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 157 :276-283
[10]   Simulating price patterns for tradable green certificates to promote electricity generation from wind [J].
Ford, Andrew ;
Vogstad, Klaus ;
Flynn, Hilary .
ENERGY POLICY, 2007, 35 (01) :91-111