Mapping open science research using a keyword bibliographic coupling analysis network

被引:3
作者
Lee, Jae Yun [1 ,2 ]
Chung, EunKyung [3 ]
机构
[1] Myongji Univ, Dept Lib & Informat Sci, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Kyonggi Univ, Suwon, South Korea
[3] Ewha Womans Univ, Dept Lib & Informat Sci, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
INCREASE;
D O I
10.47989/irpaper949
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Introduction: The open science movement has grown rapidly since the mid-2010s, and research has been conducted in various disciplines such as public health, medicine, education, and computer science. Research results have mainly been published in the journals of information science, computer science, and multidisciplinary fields. Method: To identify the intellectual structure of open science, we constructed a keyword bibliographic coupling analysis network. We examined a total of 1,000 articles on open science from the Web of Science, extracting and analysing 4,645 keywords. Then, we implemented and visualised the keyword bibliographic coupling network by constructing a keyword dataset and a reference dataset for each keyword. Results: By analysing the backbone keywords and clusters in the network, the study revealed that the most prominent keywords were open access, open data, and reproducibility. The analysis also uncovered nine clusters in open science research: open access, reproducibility, data sharing, preregistrations and registered reports, research data, open peer review, tools and platforms for reproducible research, open innovation, science policy, and preprints. These results indicated that open science research focuses on transparency and reproducibility. Additionally, it is noteworthy that this study revealed a considerable focus on the open innovation and science policy areas, which have not received much attention in previous studies. Conclusions: The findings can help to understand the landscape of open science research and may guide research funding institutes and research policymakers to design their policies to improve the open science scholarly environment.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 41 条
[21]   The future(s) of open science [J].
Mirowski, Philip .
SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, 2018, 48 (02) :171-203
[22]  
Muralimanohar J., 2011, Qual. Assur. J, V14, P33, DOI DOI 10.1002/QAJ.482
[23]   Promoting an open research culture [J].
Nosek, B. A. ;
Alter, G. ;
Banks, G. C. ;
Borsboom, D. ;
Bowman, S. D. ;
Breckler, S. J. ;
Buck, S. ;
Chambers, C. D. ;
Chin, G. ;
Christensen, G. ;
Contestabile, M. ;
Dafoe, A. ;
Eich, E. ;
Freese, J. ;
Glennerster, R. ;
Goroff, D. ;
Green, D. P. ;
Hesse, B. ;
Humphreys, M. ;
Ishiyama, J. ;
Karlan, D. ;
Kraut, A. ;
Lupia, A. ;
Mabry, P. ;
Madon, T. A. ;
Malhotra, N. ;
Mayo-Wilson, E. ;
McNutt, M. ;
Miguel, E. ;
Paluck, E. Levy ;
Simonsohn, U. ;
Soderberg, C. ;
Spellman, B. A. ;
Turitto, J. ;
VandenBos, G. ;
Vazire, S. ;
Wagenmakers, E. J. ;
Wilson, R. ;
Yarkoni, T. .
SCIENCE, 2015, 348 (6242) :1422-1425
[24]   Registered Reports A Method to Increase the Credibility of Published Results [J].
Nosek, Brian A. ;
Lakens, Daniel .
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 45 (03) :137-141
[25]   The roles of academic libraries in propagating open science: A qualitative literature review [J].
Ogungbeni, John I. ;
Obiamalu, Amaka R. ;
Ssemambo, Samuel ;
Bazibu, Charles M. .
INFORMATION DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 34 (02) :113-121
[26]   Reproducible Research in Computational Science [J].
Peng, Roger D. .
SCIENCE, 2011, 334 (6060) :1226-1227
[27]   The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles [J].
Piwowar, Heather ;
Priem, Jason ;
Lariviere, Vincent ;
Alperin, Juan Pablo ;
Matthias, Lisa ;
Norlander, Bree ;
Farley, Ashley ;
West, Jevin ;
Haustein, Stefanie .
PEERJ, 2018, 6
[28]   Who Shares? Who Doesn't? Factors Associated with Openly Archiving Raw Research Data [J].
Piwowar, Heather A. .
PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (07)
[29]   Survey on open peer review: Attitudes and experience amongst editors, authors and reviewers [J].
Ross-Hellauer, Tony ;
Deppe, Arvid ;
Schmidt, Birgit .
PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (12)
[30]  
Ross-Hellauer Tony, 2017, F1000Res, V6, P588, DOI 10.12688/f1000research.11369.2