A systematic review of factors influencing decision-making in adults living with chronic kidney disease

被引:96
作者
Murray, Mary Ann [1 ]
Brunier, Gillian [2 ]
Chung, Jenny Oey
Craig, Lee Ann [3 ]
Mills, Cynthia
Thomas, Alison [4 ]
Stacey, Dawn [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ottawa, Sch Nursing, Ottawa, ON K1H 8M5, Canada
[2] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Div Nephrol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] London Hlth Sci Ctr, London, ON, Canada
[4] St Michaels Hosp, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
Chronic kidney disease; End stage renal disease; Shared decision-making; Decision support; Patient decision aids; Systematic review; STAGE RENAL-DISEASE; PATIENTS PREFERENCES; PERITONEAL-DIALYSIS; CARDIOPULMONARY-RESUSCITATION; HEMODIALYSIS-PATIENTS; MODALITY SELECTION; CARE; TRANSPLANTATION; QUALITY; ACCESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.pec.2008.12.010
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: To identify factors influencing patient involvement in decision-making in the context of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and effective interventions to support their decision-making needs. Methods: A systematic review included studies and decision support tools that involved: (1) adults with CKD, (2) studies published from 1998-2008: and (3) a focus on patient decision-making needs, and/or barriers and facilitators to shared decision-making. Studies were quality appraised. Results: Forty studies were appraised. These studies mainly focused on the decisions patients with CKD faced around the choice of renal replacement therapy and withholding/withdrawing dialysis. Moreover, studies typically focused on health care professional's provision of information about the decision rather than identifying decisional conflict and supporting patients in decision-making. No studies were found that identified the patient's point of view about factors that might influence or inhibit quality decision-making. Factors influencing CKD patient's participation in decision included: (1) interpersonal relationships; (2) preservation of current well being, normality and quality of life; (3) need for control; and (4) personal importance on benefits and risks. Of the four patient decision aids identified, none had been evaluated for effectiveness. Conclusion: Patients with CKD face decisions that are likely to cause decisional conflict. Most studies focused on information needs related to renal replacement therapy and withdrawing or withholding dialysis. There was less focus on other decision-making needs in the context of those choices and across the trajectory of CKD. Although patient decision aids and implementation of shared decision-making have been evaluated in patients with other medical conditions, little is known about interventions to support patients with CKD making quality decisions. Practice implications: Patients with CKD have decision-making needs across the trajectory of their illness. Although little is known about supporting patients with CKD decision-making, support could be provided with protocols and tools that have been developed for other chronic illness situations. Development of CKD-specific clinical practice guidelines that include decision support best practices could benefit CKD patients. Research priorities include development and evaluation of CKD focused decision support tools and processes. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 158
页数:10
相关论文
共 57 条
  • [1] Agraharkar Mahendra, 2003, Adv Perit Dial, V19, P163
  • [2] Advance care planning by or on behalf of peritoneal dialysis patients in long-term care
    Anderson, John E.
    Sikorski, Ilze
    Finucane, Thomas E.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2006, 48 (01) : 122 - 127
  • [3] Andrew J, 2001, EDTNA ERCA J, V27, P72
  • [4] [Anonymous], COCHRANE DATABASE SY
  • [5] Renal dialysis abatement: lessons from a social study
    Ashby, M
    Hoog, CO
    Kellehear, A
    Kerr, PG
    Brooks, D
    Nicholls, K
    Forrest, M
    [J]. PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2005, 19 (05) : 389 - 396
  • [6] The effect of patients' preferences on racial differences in access to renal transplantation
    Ayanian, JZ
    Cleary, PD
    Weissman, JS
    Epstein, AM
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 341 (22) : 1661 - 1669
  • [7] BADZEK L, 1998, ANNA J, P293
  • [8] How strong are patients' preferences in choices between dialysis modalities and doses?
    Bass, EB
    Wills, S
    Fink, NE
    Jenckes, MW
    Sadler, JH
    Levey, AS
    Meyer, K
    Powe, NR
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2004, 44 (04) : 695 - 705
  • [9] The hemodialysis access: Preferences and concerns of patients, dialysis nurses and technicians, and physicians
    Bay, WH
    Van Cleef, S
    Owens, M
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEPHROLOGY, 1998, 18 (05) : 379 - 383
  • [10] Survival by time of day of hemodialysis in an elderly cohort
    Bliwise, DL
    Kutner, NG
    Zhang, R
    Parker, KP
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 286 (21): : 2690 - 2694