Revising in two languages: A multi-dimensional comparison of online writing revisions in L1 and FL

被引:72
作者
Stevenson, Marie
Schoonen, Rob
de Glopper, Kees
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Fac Educ & Social Work, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] Univ Groningen, Dept Language & Commun, NL-9700 AB Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
on-line revision; keystroke-logging; inhibition; higher level processes; revising behavior;
D O I
10.1016/j.jslw.2006.06.002
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
It has frequently been claimed that, in foreign language writing, attention to linguistic processes inhibits attention available for higher level conceptual processing [e.g., Chenoweth & Hayes, 2001; Whalen & Menard, 1995]. This Study examines this hypothesis for foreign language revision processes by comparing online revisions made by 22 Dutch junior high school writers when producing computer-written texts in Dutch and English (FL). This comparison is made using a multi-dimensional revision taxonomy. The study combines the use of think-aloud and keystroke-logging techniques. The relationship between different types of revisions and text quality is also considered. The results indicate that, although revisions made to linguistic elements were more frequent in FL, there was little evidence that students' higher level revision processes were inhibited in FL writing. Little relationship was found between revision frequencies and text quality. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 233
页数:33
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
Alderson J.C., 1984, READING FOREIGN LANG, P1
[2]  
[Anonymous], STUDIES WRITING
[3]  
[Anonymous], J 2 LANGUAGE WRITING
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1996, SCI WRITING THEORIES
[5]  
BAILYSTOK E, 1991, LANGUAGE PROCESSING
[6]   INTERPRETING RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN L1 AND L2 READING - CONSOLIDATING THE LINGUISTIC THRESHOLD AND THE LINGUISTIC INTERDEPENDENCE HYPOTHESES [J].
BERNHARDT, EB ;
KAMIL, ML .
APPLIED LINGUISTICS, 1995, 16 (01) :15-34
[7]  
Bialystok E., 2001, ANNU REV APPL LINGUI, V21, P169, DOI DOI 10.1017/S0267190501000101
[8]  
Bossers Baltimore, 1991, AILA Review, V8, P45
[9]   IS WRITTEN LANGUAGE PRODUCTION MORE DIFFICULT THAN ORAL LANGUAGE PRODUCTION - A WORKING-MEMORY APPROACH [J].
BOURDIN, B ;
FAYOL, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 29 (05) :591-620
[10]  
Bourdin B, 1996, CAH PSYCHOL COGN, V15, P245