Effect of phosphorus fertilisation on growth, yield and quality of pea (Pisum sativum)

被引:0
|
作者
Husain, Jakir [1 ,2 ]
Kashyap, Poonam [1 ]
Prusty, A. K. [1 ]
Dutta, Debashis [1 ]
Sharma, Shiv Shankar [1 ,2 ]
Panwar, A. S. [1 ]
Kumar, Sunil [1 ]
机构
[1] ICAR Indian Inst Farming Syst Res, Meerut 250110, Uttar Pradesh, India
[2] Mahatma Jyoti Rao Phoole Univ, Dept Hort, Jaipur 302019, Rajasthan, India
来源
关键词
Arkel; Azad P-1; Phosphorus; Pea; Quality and Yield;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
In the present study, experiments were undertaken during 2016 2017 to examine the effect of phosphorus application on pea (Pisum sativum L.) cv. Arkel and Azad P-1. Four levels of phosphorus (0, 60, 90, 120 kg/ha) keeping the N at K dose constant at 25 and 50 kg ha(-1) respectively with 3 replications were used in two way factorial analysis. The effects of different doses of phosphorus were judged on growth, yield and quality attributes. Evaluation of comparative performance of pea varieties Arkel and Azad P-1 in the climatic condition of Western plain zones of Uttar Pradesh suggested better performance of Azad P-1 over Arkel. However, on studying the interaction between NPK levels and Variety, Azad P-1 with P @ 120 kg ha(-1) registered maximum pod yield (9.24 kg/plant) than Arkel (8.55 kg/plant). Results revealed that the performance of pea variety Azad P-1 was better than the variety Arkel. The higher number of pods per plant (17.94), weight of pods per plant (124.86 g), number of grains per pod (7.72) and pod yield per plot (7.79 kg) was recorded in the variety Arkel than Azad P-1. The study also revealed that ascorbic acid as well as total sugar content in harvested pods showed a declining trend with higher level of phosphorus irrespective of variety. Thus, pea variety Azad P-1 was found to be performing better with phosphorus application of 120 kg/ha in terms of growth, yield and quality attributes. This variety can hence be recommended for integration in horticulture based farming systems of Western Uttar Pradesh.
引用
收藏
页码:1303 / 1307
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] EFFECT OF SEAWEED EXTRACT AND NITROGEN FERTILIZER ON THE GROWTH AND YIELD TRAITS OF PEA (PISUM SATIVUM L.)
    Al-Majdi, M. H. K.
    Alabojaml, N. H. N.
    Mehdi, D. H.
    SABRAO JOURNAL OF BREEDING AND GENETICS, 2024, 56 (05): : 2119 - 2126
  • [23] POTENTIAL OF FOLIAR APPLICATION OF MICRONUTRIENTS ON GROWTH, YIELD, QUALITY AND NUTRACEUTICAL PROPERTIES OF PEA (PISUM SATIVUM L.)
    Naz, Safina
    Latif, Muhammad Usman
    Haider, Sakeena Tul-Ain
    Ali, Sajid
    Sardar, Hasan
    Ahmad, Riaz
    Anjum, Muhammad Akbar
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2022, 54 (03) : 931 - 942
  • [24] Effect of integrated nutrient management on yield attributes and economics of pea (Pisum sativum)
    Bhattarai, RK
    Singh, LN
    Singh, RKK
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2003, 73 (04): : 219 - 220
  • [25] NOTE ON EFFECT OF DELAYED SOWING ON YIELD OF PEA (PISUM-SATIVUM-L)
    CHAUBEY, CN
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 1977, 11 (02) : 119 - 121
  • [26] Effects of PGPR on phosphorus solubility in soil and on growth of Pea (Pisum sativum L.)
    Waheed, A.
    Gulab, H.
    Haleem, M. A.
    Israr, M.
    Ali, S.
    Ahmad, M.
    Chen, J.
    Yu, M. L.
    ALLELOPATHY JOURNAL, 2021, 54 (02): : 169 - 182
  • [27] INFLUENCE OF NITRIFICATION INHIBITORS ON THE YIELD AND QUALITY OF FIELD PEA (PISUM-SATIVUM-L)
    FICNAR, S
    ROSTLINNA VYROBA, 1988, 34 (06): : 627 - 634
  • [28] Pisum sativum (Pea)
    Burstin, Judith
    Kreplak, Jonathan
    Macas, Jiri
    Lichtenzveig, Judith
    TRENDS IN GENETICS, 2020, 36 (04) : 312 - 313
  • [29] FERTILISATION OF PEA (PISUM SATIVUM L.) WITH NITROGEN AND POTASSIUM AND ITS EFFECT ON SOIL ENZYMATIC ACTIVITY
    Symanowicz, Barbara
    Kalembasa, Stanislaw
    Niedbala, Mateusz
    Toczko, Martyna
    Skwarek, Korneliusz
    JOURNAL OF ELEMENTOLOGY, 2018, 23 (01): : 57 - 67
  • [30] Assessment of growth parameters and yield of pea (Pisum sativum) under different irrigation methods
    Singhal, Neha
    Sharma, Poonam
    Sharda, Rakesh
    Siag, Mukesh
    Cutting, Nikhil Gladwin
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2021, 91 (09): : 1378 - 1381