Monitored convergence curve: a new framework for metaheuristic structural optimization algorithms

被引:29
作者
Azad, Saeid Kazemzadeh [1 ]
机构
[1] Atilim Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
Structural optimization; Metaheuristic algorithms; Monitored convergence curve; Adaptive dimensional search; Big bang-big crunch algorithm; AISC-LRFD; SPACE STEEL FRAMES; DESIGN; SEARCH;
D O I
10.1007/s00158-019-02219-5
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Metaheuristic optimization algorithms, by nature, depend on random processes, and therefore, performing numerous algorithm runs is inevitable to locate a reasonably good solution. Although executing the algorithms for small-size or trivial structural optimization problems could be computationally affordable, when dealing with challenging optimization problems, there is almost no chance of performing numerous independent runs of metaheuristics in a timely manner. This difficulty is basically due to the limitations in computational technologies as well as the excessive computational cost of such problems. In such cases that the number of independent runs is limited to a small number, each optimization run becomes highly valuable and, therefore, the stability of results becomes much more significant. In the present study, it is attempted to monitor the convergence curve of each succeeding run of the algorithm with respect to the information obtained in the previous runs. An easy-to-implement yet efficient framework is proposed for metaheuristic structural optimization algorithms where every succeeding run is monitored at certain intervals named as solution monitoring period. The solution monitoring period is selected such that, at each run, on the one hand, the algorithm could explore the search space to improve the solution quality, and on the other hand, the algorithm is occasionally forced to return to the previously visited more promising solutions if it is not able to improve the solution after a certain number of iterations. The numerical experiments using challenging test instances with up to 354 design variables indicate that, in general, the proposed approach helps to improve the solution quality as well as the robustness or stability of results in metaheuristic structural optimization.
引用
收藏
页码:481 / 499
页数:19
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC), 1994, Manual of Steel Construction, Load & Resistance Factor Design, V2nd
[2]   Seeding the initial population with feasible solutions in metaheuristic optimization of steel trusses [J].
Azad, Saeid Kazemzadeh .
ENGINEERING OPTIMIZATION, 2018, 50 (01) :89-105
[3]   Enhanced hybrid metaheuristic algorithms for optimal sizing of steel truss structures with numerous discrete variables [J].
Azad, Saeid Kazemzadeh .
STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2017, 55 (06) :2159-2180
[4]  
Bellman R.E., 1957, DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING
[5]   Measuring the curse of dimensionality and its effects on particle swarm optimization and differential evolution [J].
Chen, Stephen ;
Montgomery, James ;
Bolufe-Roehler, Antonio .
APPLIED INTELLIGENCE, 2015, 42 (03) :514-526
[6]  
Colorni A., 1991, Distributed optimization by ant colonies, V142, P134, DOI DOI 10.1109/MHS.1995.494215
[7]  
Csebfalvi A, 2012, INT J OPTIM CIVIL EN, V2, P137
[8]   A practical tutorial on the use of nonparametric statistical tests as a methodology for comparing evolutionary and swarm intelligence algorithms [J].
Derrac, Joaquin ;
Garcia, Salvador ;
Molina, Daniel ;
Herrera, Francisco .
SWARM AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2011, 1 (01) :3-18
[9]   A new optimization method: Big Bang Big Crunch [J].
Erol, OK ;
Eksin, I .
ADVANCES IN ENGINEERING SOFTWARE, 2006, 37 (02) :106-111
[10]   Structural optimization by wavelet transforms and neural networks [J].
Gholizadeh, S. ;
Samavati, O. A. .
APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2011, 35 (02) :915-929