Cost analysis model of outpatient management of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome with paracentesis: "Tap early and often" versus hospitalization

被引:25
作者
Csokmay, John M. [1 ,3 ]
Yauger, Belinda J. [1 ,3 ]
Henne, Melinda B. [1 ]
Armstrong, Alicia Y. [1 ,3 ]
Queenan, John T. [2 ]
Segars, James H. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Walter Reed Army Med Ctr, Washington, DC 20307 USA
[2] Univ Rochester, Med Ctr, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
[3] Eunice Kennedy Shriver Natl Inst Child Hlth & Hum, Reprod Biol & Med Branch, NIH, Bethesda, MD USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome; OHSS; paracentesis; cost-analysis; outpatient management; ART; cost; INVITRO FERTILIZATION; SYNDROME OHSS; FLUID; PREVENTION; ASPIRATION; ASCITES;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.09.054
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the cost of two treatment regimens for moderate to severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS): conservative inpatient versus outpatient management with paracentesis. Design: A decision-tree mathematical model comparing conservative inpatient versus outpatient management of moderate to severe OHSS was created. The common final pathway of either management was resolution of OHSS. Sensitivity analyses were performed over the range of variables. Main Outcome Measure(s): Total management cost of OHSS. Result(s): The cost of conservative therapy including first-tier complications was $10,099 (range $9,655-$15,044). The cost of outpatient management with paracentesis was $1954 (range $788-$12,041). This resulted in an estimated cost savings of $8145 with outpatient management with paracentesis. One-way sensitivity analyses were performed. Varying the probability of admission after outpatient treatment still indicated that outpatient treatment was the most cost-effective (probability = 1.0, cost = $6110). Varying the duration of hospitalization with primary inpatient treatment was equal to outpatient treatment costs only at a stay of 0.71 days or shorter. Conclusion(s): Our model suggests early outpatient paracentesis for moderate to severe OHSS is the most cost-effective management plan when compared with traditional conservative inpatient therapy. The cost savings for outpatient management persisted throughout a variety of outcome probabilities. (Fertil Steril(R) 2010;93:167-73. (C)2010 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 173
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
ABOULGHAR MA, 1993, OBSTET GYNECOL, V81, P108
[2]  
ABOULGHAR MA, 1990, FERTIL STERIL, V53, P933
[3]  
BORENSTEIN R, 1989, FERTIL STERIL, V51, P791
[4]   Epidemiology and prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS): a review [J].
Delvigne, A ;
Rozenberg, S .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2002, 8 (06) :559-577
[5]   An ounce of prevention: outpatient management of the ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome [J].
Fluker, MR ;
Copeland, JE ;
Yuzpe, AA .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2000, 73 (04) :821-824
[6]  
Golan A, 1989, Obstet Gynecol Surv, V44, P430, DOI 10.1097/00006254-198906000-00004
[7]  
GOLDSMAN MP, 1995, FERTIL STERIL, V63, P268
[8]   Complications of IVF and ovulation induction [J].
Klemetti, R ;
Sevón, T ;
Gissler, M ;
Hemminki, E .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2005, 20 (12) :3293-3300
[9]   Vascular permeability factor and vascular endothelial growth factor in ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: A preliminary report [J].
Krasnow, JS ;
Berga, SL ;
Guzick, DS ;
Zeleznik, AJ ;
Yeo, KT .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1996, 65 (03) :552-555
[10]   Aggressive outpatient treatment of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome with ascites using transvaginal culdocentesis and intravenous albumin minimizes hospitalization [J].
Lincoln, SR ;
Opsahl, MS ;
Blauer, KL ;
Black, SH ;
Schulman, JD .
JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2002, 19 (04) :159-163