Mediation in Dyadic Data at the Level of the Dyads: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach

被引:72
作者
Ledermann, Thomas [1 ]
Macho, Siegfried [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Psychol, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[2] Univ Freiburg, Dept Psychol, D-7800 Freiburg, Germany
关键词
mediation; dyadic data; Common Fate Model; Structural Equation Modeling; bootstrapping; CORRELATIONAL ANALYSIS; EQUIVALENT MODELS; MARITAL QUALITY; INTERDEPENDENCE; SATISFACTION; MODERATOR; CONFLICT; TESTS; SELF;
D O I
10.1037/a0016197
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
An extended version of the Common Fate Model (CFM) is presented to estimate and test mediation in dyadic data. The model can be used for distinguishable dyad members (e.g., heterosexual couples) or indistinguishable dyad members (e.g., homosexual couples) if (a) the variables measure characteristics of the dyadic relationship or shared external influences that affect both partners; if (b) the causal associations between the variables should be analyzed at the dyadic level; and if (c) the measured variables are reliable indicators of the latent variables. To assess mediation using Structural Equation Modeling, a general three-step procedure is suggested. The first is a selection of a good fitting model, the second a test of the direct effects, and the third a test of the mediating effect by means of bootstrapping. The application of the model along with the procedure for assessing mediation is illustrated using data from 184 couples on marital problems, communication, and marital quality. Differences with the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model and the analysis of longitudinal mediation by using the CFM are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:661 / 670
页数:10
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   A different paradigm for the initial colonisation of Sahul [J].
Allen, Jim ;
O'Connell, James F. .
ARCHAEOLOGY IN OCEANIA, 2020, 55 (01) :1-14
[2]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[3]  
Bodenmann G., 2000, Stress und coping bei paaren [Stress and coping in couples
[4]   Stress, sex, and satisfaction in marriage [J].
Bodenmann, Guy ;
Ledermann, Thomas ;
Bradbury, Thomas N. .
PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS, 2007, 14 (04) :551-569
[5]  
Bollen K.A., 1990, Sociol Methodol, V20, P115, DOI DOI 10.2307/271084
[6]   BOOTSTRAPPING GOODNESS-OF-FIT MEASURES IN STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS [J].
BOLLEN, KA ;
STINE, RA .
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 1992, 21 (02) :205-229
[7]  
Browne M.W., 1993, Sociological Methods and Research, P136, DOI DOI 10.1177/0049124192021002005
[8]   Ideal standards, the self, and flexibility of ideals in close relationships [J].
Campbell, L ;
Simpson, JA ;
Kashy, DA ;
Fletcher, GJO .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2001, 27 (04) :447-462
[9]   Comparison of approaches to constructing confidence intervals for mediating effects using structural equation models [J].
Cheung, Mike W. -L. .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2007, 14 (02) :227-246
[10]  
Christensen A., 1984, COMMUNICATION PATTER