Persuasion in Auditing: A Review Through the Lens of the Communication-Persuasion Matrix

被引:5
作者
Aghazadeh, Sanaz [1 ]
Brown, J. Owen [2 ]
Guichard, Laura [1 ,3 ]
Hoang, Kris [4 ]
机构
[1] Louisiana State Univ, EJ Ourso Coll Business, Dept Accounting, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
[2] Baylor Univ, Paul L Foster Campus Business & Innovat, Hankamer Sch Business, Dept Accounting & Business Law, Waco, TX 76798 USA
[3] Univ Louisiana Lafayette, BI Moody III Coll Business Adm, Dept Accounting, Lafayette, LA 70504 USA
[4] Univ Alabama, Culverhouse Coll Business, Culverhouse Sch Accountancy, Tuscaloosa, AL USA
关键词
Persuasion; Auditing; Judgment and decision-making; Communication-Persuasion Matrix;
D O I
10.1080/09638180.2020.1863243
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We provide a comprehensive review and synthesis of behavioral experimental literature that examines persuasion in auditing. We organize our review by applying the five Components of Persuasive Communication from the Communication-Persuasion Matrix. Our synthesis identifies two primary contexts in which persuasion attempts occur in the auditing setting: (1) auditors and clients engaging in or coping with others' persuasive communications; (2) auditors coping with subordinates' persuasion attempts in working papers. From our analysis, we identify a concentration of prior persuasion research on source, message, and receiver variables, and we develop 26 questions for future research to consider based on gaps we identify in the literature. Our literature review specifies and organizes key features of persuasion in auditing, enhances our understanding of how auditors and clients initiate and respond to persuasive communications, and discusses significant implications for both audit quality and financial reporting outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 172
页数:28
相关论文
共 134 条
  • [1] Abdolmohammadi M, 2015, ADV ACCT BEH RES, V18, P69, DOI 10.1108/S1475-148820150000018016
  • [2] Aghazadeh S., 2020, MANAGEMENT CONFIDENC
  • [4] How Do Audit Workpaper Reviewers Cope with the Conflicting Pressures of Detecting Misstatements and Balancing Client Workloads?
    Agoglia, Christopher P.
    Brazel, Joseph F.
    Hatfield, Richard C.
    Jackson, Scott B.
    [J]. AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2010, 29 (02): : 27 - 43
  • [5] The Effects of Audit Review Format on Review Team Judgments
    Agoglia, Christopher P.
    Hatfield, Richard C.
    Brazel, Joseph F.
    [J]. AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2009, 28 (01): : 95 - 111
  • [6] The effects of alternative justification memos on the judgments of audit reviewees and reviewers
    Agoglia, CP
    Kida, T
    Hanno, DM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2003, 41 (01) : 33 - 46
  • [7] The role of incentives to manage earnings and quantification in auditors' evaluations of management-provided information
    Anderson, U
    Kadous, K
    Koonce, L
    [J]. AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2004, 23 (01): : 11 - 27
  • [8] Andiola L.M., 2017, ROUTLEDGE COMPANION, P473, DOI 10.4324/9781315710129-30
  • [9] Asare StephenK., 2008, BEHAV RES ACCOUNT, V20, P1
  • [10] How Do Look-Back Analyses and Evidence Specificity Affect Auditors' Planning Judgments?
    Backof, Ann G.
    Martin, Roger D.
    Thayer, Jane
    [J]. ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2020, 95 (06) : 51 - 72