Does the Prevalence of Ossified Fabella Vary in Knee Osteoarthritis and Age-Related Degeneration? A Meta-Analysis of About 11,000 Knees

被引:9
作者
Asghar, Adil [1 ]
Naaz, Shagufta [2 ]
Narayan, Ravi K. [1 ]
Kumar, Anup [3 ]
机构
[1] All India Inst Med Sci Patna, Anat, Patna, Bihar, India
[2] All India Inst Med Sci Patna, Anesthesiol, Patna, Bihar, India
[3] All India Inst Med Sci Patna, Orthopaed, Patna, Bihar, India
关键词
risk ratio; fabellar prevalence; knee joints; osteoarthritis; age-related degeneration;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.12535
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: Osteoarthritis (OA) and age-related degeneration (ARD) are stimulants for the development of the fabella in the knee joint. This meta-analysis updates previous studies and reviews on the prevalence of the fabella in OA or ARD knee joints. In addition, it provides a quantitative estimation of the fabellar prevalence in knees having OA and ARD. Methodology: Twenty studies containing data from 11,056 knee joints were utilized in the investigation, consisting of 6,819 knees of individuals with OA (including those with age greater than 40 years) and 4,237 knees of individuals without OA (including less than 40 years of age), respectively. Totally, 2,434 knees of the OA subjects had fabellae (including more than 40 years), while in the non-OA subjects, 844 had fabellae (including less than 40years). The odds ratio (OR) and relative risk (RR) were calculated. Results: The fabellar prevalence was observed to be higher in OA knees, where the risk ratio of developing fabella was 2.55 (2.15-3.02). Compared with this, the risk ratio for the incidence of fabella in ARD knee was 1.71 (1.59-1.85). The bilateral occurrence of fabella was more common than unilateral. The risk of developing fabella in individuals aged less than 40-year was 0.59 which was 41% less than individuals aged more than 40 years. The risk ratio of developing fabella in co-exposure of ARI) and OA was 1.84 [1.66, 2.04, 95% CI]. Conclusion: OA and ARD would increase the prevalence of ossified fabella by 84%, thus acting as stimulants or associations and risk factors for ossified fabella.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Human biological variation in sesamoid bone prevalence: the curious case of the fabella [J].
Berthaume, Michael A. ;
Bull, Anthony M. J. .
JOURNAL OF ANATOMY, 2020, 236 (02) :228-242
[2]  
Chihlas C.N., 1993, CLIN ANAT, V6, P163, DOI 10.1002/ca.980060306
[3]  
CHUNG L, 1934, KEIO J MED, V5, P1
[4]  
Corvalan C, 2018, EUR J ANAT, V22, P103
[5]   A Comprehensive Review of the Fabella Bone [J].
Dalip, Dominic ;
Iwanaga, Joe ;
Oskouian, Rod J. ;
Tubbs, R. Shane .
CUREUS, 2018, 10 (06)
[6]   Prevalence and distribution of the fabella: a radiographic study in Turkish subjects [J].
Egerci, O. F. ;
Kose, O. ;
Turan, A. ;
Kilicaslan, O. F. ;
Sekerci, R. ;
Keles-Celik, N. .
FOLIA MORPHOLOGICA, 2017, 76 (03) :478-483
[7]   Potentially symptomatic fabella: MR imaging review [J].
Ehara, Shigeru .
JAPANESE JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2014, 32 (01) :1-5
[8]  
Ghimire I, 2017, J Chitwan Med Coll, V7, P11, DOI [10.3126/jcmc.v7i2.22995, DOI 10.3126/JCMC.V7I2.22995]
[9]  
Gruber W, 1875, MEMOIRES ACAD IMPERI, V18, P1875
[10]  
HAGIHARA H, 1993, ORTHOPETICS TRAUMATO, V42, P995, DOI DOI 10.5035/NISHISEISAI.42.995