Mapping the Relationship Between Critical Thinking and Design Thinking

被引:23
作者
Ericson, Jonathan D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Bentley Univ, Informat Design & Corp Commun, 175 Forest St, Waltham, MA 02452 USA
关键词
Critical thinking; Design thinking; Education; Entrepreneurship; Innovation; Knowledge economy; DIVERGENT-THINKING; CONVERGENT; INNOVATION; EMPATHY; TOOL;
D O I
10.1007/s13132-021-00733-w
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Critical thinking has been a longstanding goal of education, while design thinking has gradually emerged as a popular method for supporting entrepreneurship, innovation, and problem solving in modern business. While some scholars have posited that design thinking may support critical thinking, empirical research examining the relationship between these two modes of thinking is lacking because their shared conceptual structure has not been articulated in detail and because they have remained siloed in practice. This essay maps eleven essential components of critical thinking to a variety of methods drawn from three popular design thinking frameworks. The mapping reveals that these seemingly unrelated modes of thinking share common features but also differ in important respects. A detailed comparison of the two modes of thinking suggests that design thinking methods have the potential to support and augment traditional critical thinking practices, and that design thinking frameworks could be modified to more explicitly incorporate critical thinking. The article concludes with a discussion of implications for the knowledge economy, and a research agenda for researchers, educators, and practitioners.
引用
收藏
页码:406 / 429
页数:24
相关论文
共 100 条
[1]   Productive thinking in middle school science students' design conversations in a design-based engineering challenge [J].
Aranda, Maurina L. ;
Lie, Richard ;
Guzey, S. Selcen .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY AND DESIGN EDUCATION, 2020, 30 (01) :67-81
[2]  
Association for Computing Machinery, 2018, ACM Code of Ethics and Professional Responsibility
[3]  
Bailin Sharon, 1988, ACHIEVING EXTRAORDIN, DOI [10.1007/978-94-009-2780-3, DOI 10.1007/978-94-009-2780-3]
[4]  
Bailin Sharon., 1987, Informal Logic, VIX., P23
[5]  
Banfield Richard., 2015, DESIGN SPRINT PRACTI
[6]   Design Thinking: A Fresh Approach for Transformative Assessment Practice [J].
Benson, Joy ;
Dresdow, Sally .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT EDUCATION, 2014, 38 (03) :436-461
[7]   Reconciling the tension between consistency and relevance: design thinking as a mechanism for brand ambidexterity [J].
Beverland, Michael B. ;
Wilner, Sarah J. S. ;
Micheli, Pietro .
JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF MARKETING SCIENCE, 2015, 43 (05) :589-609
[8]  
Bloom B., 1956, HDB 1 COGNITIVE DOMA
[9]  
Bonwell C.C., 1991, 1991 ASHE ERIC HIGHE
[10]   Developing Career Adaptability and Innovative Capabilities Through Learning and Working in Norway and the United Kingdom [J].
Brown, Alan .
JOURNAL OF THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY, 2015, 6 (02) :402-419