Modeling group process constructs at three stages in group psychotherapy

被引:44
作者
Bakali, Jan V. [1 ]
Baldwin, Scott A. [2 ]
Lorentzen, Steinar [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Olso Univ Hosp, Clin Mental Hlth, Aker, Norway
[2] Brigham Young Univ, Dept Psychol, Provo, UT 84602 USA
[3] Univ Oslo, Inst Psychiat, N-0316 Oslo, Norway
关键词
group psychotherapy; process research; THERAPEUTIC ALLIANCE; GROUP CLIMATE; COHESION; VALIDATION; PREDICTORS; INVENTORY;
D O I
10.1080/10503300902894430
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
This study examined the relationships among group therapy processes measured by the Working Alliance Inventory-Short Form, the Therapeutic Factors Inventory Cohesiveness subscale, and the Group Climate Questionnaire-Short Form in a sample of 145 patients attending 18 psychodynamic groups. Five hypothesized models were tested early in therapy (Sessions 3 and 4) using multilevel confirmatory factor analysis. Two three-factor models approached conventional standards of model fit. By merging these two models, a three-factor model consisting of member-leader alliance, positive bonding relationship, and negative relationship fit the data well. Later in therapy, member-leader bonding was no longer important to member-group cohesion, indicating that cohesion and alliance and the member-leader versus member-group bonding represent different processes.
引用
收藏
页码:332 / 343
页数:12
相关论文
共 48 条
[21]   RELATION BETWEEN WORKING ALLIANCE AND OUTCOME IN PSYCHOTHERAPY - A METAANALYSIS [J].
HORVATH, AO ;
SYMONDS, BD .
JOURNAL OF COUNSELING PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 38 (02) :139-149
[22]   DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF THE WORKING ALLIANCE INVENTORY [J].
HORVATH, AO ;
GREENBERG, LS .
JOURNAL OF COUNSELING PSYCHOLOGY, 1989, 36 (02) :223-233
[23]  
Hox J. J., 2002, MULTILEVEL ANAL TECH, V2nd, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781410604118
[24]   Group climate, cohesion, alliance, and empathy in group psychotherapy: Multilevel structural equation models [J].
Johnson, JE ;
Burlingame, GM ;
Olsen, JA ;
Davies, DR ;
Gleave, RL .
JOURNAL OF COUNSELING PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 52 (03) :310-321
[25]   Cohesion, alliance, and outcome in group psychotherapy: Comments on Joyce, Piper, & Ogrodniczuk (2007) [J].
Johnson, Jennifer .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GROUP PSYCHOTHERAPY, 2007, 57 (04) :533-540
[26]   Therapeutic alliance and cohesion variables as predictors of outcome in short-term group psychotherapy [J].
Joyce, Anthony S. ;
Piper, William E. ;
Ogrodniczuk, John S. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GROUP PSYCHOTHERAPY, 2007, 57 (03) :269-296
[27]   BRIEF CRISIS GROUP-PSYCHOTHERAPY VERSUS THE INITIAL SESSIONS OF LONG-TERM GROUP-PSYCHOTHERAPY - AN EXPLORATORY COMPARISON [J].
JOYCE, AS ;
AZIM, HFA ;
MORIN, H .
GROUP, 1988, 12 (01) :3-19
[28]  
Kivlighan D.M., 1997, GROUP DYNAMICS, V1, P208
[29]   ANALYSIS OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE WORKING ALLIANCE USING HIERARCHICAL LINEAR MODELING [J].
KIVLIGHAN, DM ;
SHAUGHNESSY, P .
JOURNAL OF COUNSELING PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 42 (03) :338-349
[30]   Does group climate mediate the group leadership-group member outcome relationship? A test of Yalom's hypotheses about leadership priorities [J].
Kivlighan, DM ;
Tarrant, JM .
GROUP DYNAMICS-THEORY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2001, 5 (03) :220-234