Development and Validation of the Readiness for End-of-Life Conversations (REOLC) Scale

被引:13
作者
Berlin, Pia [1 ]
Leppin, Nico [1 ]
Nagelschmidt, Katharina [1 ]
Seifart, Carola [2 ]
Rief, Winfried [1 ]
von Blanckenburg, Pia [1 ]
机构
[1] Philipps Univ Marburg, Dept Psychol, Clin Psychol & Psychotherapy, Marburg, Germany
[2] Philipps Univ Marburg, Dept Med, Res Grp Clin Eth, Marburg, Germany
关键词
end-of-life; psycho-oncology; cancer; communication; readiness; DECISION-MAKING; ADVANCED CANCER; GERMAN VERSION; CARE; DEATH; QUALITY; COMMUNICATION; INTERVENTIONS; DISCUSSIONS; SUPPRESSION;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2021.662654
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Background: Engaging in end-of-life care considerations is beneficial when the time is right. The purpose of this study is to provide a valid instrument to assess peoples readiness for end-of-life conversations before they are initiated. Materials and Methods: A community sample was recruited in study one for exploratory factor analysis of a 13-item questionnaire. In study two, psychometric properties were analyzed with structural equation modeling in a population affected by cancer. Convergent and discriminant validity were assessed with questionnaires measuring distress, depression, anxiety, fear of progression, and distress of death and dying. Results: In study one (N = 349) exploratory factor analysis resulted in three subscales readiness (alpha = 0.84), communication (alpha = 0.76), and values (alpha = 0.56) with a possible common factor (alpha = 0.84) for a community sample. In study two (N = 84) the three-factor solution with 13 items was not supported for cancer patients. Factor structure was adapted to 12 items with one common factor readiness (alpha = 0.87). Model fit was good: chi(2)(50) = 59.18, p>0.05 (Satorra-Bentler-correction = 1.27), with chi(2)/df = 1.184, rRMSEA = 0.053 (90%-CI[0.000;0.100]), and rSRMR = 0.072. Convergent validity was supported by moderate correlations to trait gratitude, ratings of readiness to provide a living will or talk with family about the end of life. Divergent validity was supported by no or small correlation with distress, depression, general and death anxiety and fear of progression, respectively. Conclusions: Results support usage of the REOLC Scale in different settings with adapted factor structure. The questionnaire is interpreted as valid and reliable instrument to assess objective readiness for end-of-life conversations.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Interventions to encourage discussion of end-of-life preferences between members of the general population and the people closest to them - a systematic literature review [J].
Abba, Katharine ;
Byrne, Paula ;
Horton, Siobhan ;
Lloyd-Williams, Mari .
BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 2013, 12
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, HLTH BEHAV THEORY RE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II)
[4]   Suppression, accessibility of death-related thoughts, and cultural worldview defense: Exploring the psychodynamics of terror management [J].
Arndt, J ;
Greenberg, J ;
Solomon, S ;
Pyszczynski, T ;
Simon, L .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 73 (01) :5-18
[5]   Cancer and the threat of death: The cognitive dynamics of death-thought suppression and its impact on behavioral health intentions [J].
Arndt, Jamie ;
Cook, Alison ;
Goldenberg, Jamie L. ;
Cox, Cathy R. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 92 (01) :12-29
[6]   Mortality communication and post-bereavement depression among Danish family caregivers of terminal cancer patients [J].
Bachner, Yaacov G. ;
Guldin, Mai-Britt ;
Nielsen, Mette Kjaergaard .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2021, 29 (04) :1951-1958
[7]   Community perspectives of end-of-life preparedness [J].
Banner, Davina ;
Freeman, Shannon ;
Kandola, Damanpreet K. ;
Meikle, Madeline ;
Russell, Bridget K. M. ;
Sommerfeld, E. Anne ;
Flood, Donna ;
Schiller, Catharine J. .
DEATH STUDIES, 2019, 43 (04) :211-223
[8]   TESTS OF SIGNIFICANCE IN FACTOR ANALYSIS [J].
Bartlett, M. S. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY-STATISTICAL SECTION, 1950, 3 :77-85
[9]  
Baum A, 2001, PSYCHOSOC INTERV, P3
[10]  
Berlin P., 2020, EFFECT 2 ONLINE INTE