Student participation in the design of learning and teaching: Disentangling the terminology and approaches

被引:37
|
作者
Martens, S. E. [1 ]
Meeuwissen, S. N. E. [1 ]
Dolmans, D. H. J. M. [1 ]
Bovill, C. [2 ]
Konings, K. D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, Fac Hlth Med & Life Sci, Sch Hlth Profess Educ, POB 616, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Inst Acad Dev, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
EDUCATION;
D O I
10.1080/0142159X.2019.1615610
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background: Students are ever more involved in the design of educational practices, which is reflected in the growing body of literature about approaches to student participation. Similarities and differences between these approaches often remain vague since the terms are used interchangeably. This confusing and fragmented body of literature hampers our understanding the process and outcomes of student participation and choosing the most suitable approach for it. Method: We identified the three most frequently used terms related to the design of learning and teaching - design-based research (DBR), participatory design (PD), and co-creation - and disentangled the terminology by focusing on relevant definitions, aims, involvement of students, outcomes, and related terminology. Results: Differences between the approaches to student participation can be found in the degree to which students are the central actors and the degree to which the design is informed by educational theory. Conclusion: It is important to align the level of student participation with the purpose of the approach.
引用
收藏
页码:1203 / 1205
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Multidisciplinary Student Project as a Teaching Platform for Package Design
    Heinio, Sanna
    Karjalainen, Toni-Matti
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 17TH IAPRI WORLD CONFERENCE ON PACKAGING, 2010, : 220 - 224
  • [32] Participation in teaching-learning arrangements: literature review and critical appraisal of the concept of participation
    Kaerner, Tobias
    Juettler, Michael
    Fritzsche, Yannick
    Heid, Helmut
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ERZIEHUNGSWISSENSCHAFT, 2023, 26 (4): : 1053 - 1103
  • [33] Using a Novel Student-centered Teaching Method to Improve Pharmacy Student Learning
    Meng, Xin
    Yang, Lianrong
    Sun, Hui
    Du, Xiaowei
    Yang, Bingyou
    Guo, Hongwei
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL EDUCATION, 2019, 83 (02) : 171 - 179
  • [34] Approaches to teaching and learning for sustainability: Characterizing students' perceptions
    Garcia-Gonzalez, Esther
    Jimenez-Fontana, Rocio
    Goded, Pilar Azcarate
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 274
  • [35] Pedagogical Approaches to Teaching and Learning Entrepreneurship Education in the Universities
    Hasnaoui, Ferdaous
    Ferhane, Driss
    INNOVATION MANAGEMENT AND EDUCATION EXCELLENCE THROUGH VISION 2020, VOLS I -XI, 2018, : 4478 - 4484
  • [36] The Informed Design Teaching and Learning Matrix
    Crismond, David P.
    Adams, Robin S.
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2012, 101 (04) : 738 - 797
  • [37] Teaching generative construction scheduling: Proposed curriculum design and analysis of student learning for the Tri-Constraint Method
    Hall, Daniel M.
    Sriram, Ravina
    Chen, Qian
    ADVANCED ENGINEERING INFORMATICS, 2022, 51
  • [38] Teaching history for design at TU Delft: exploring types of student learning and perceived relevance of history for the architecture profession
    Hein, Carola
    van Dooren, Elise
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY AND DESIGN EDUCATION, 2020, 30 (05) : 849 - 865
  • [39] Effect of different teaching/learning approaches using virtual patients on student's situational interest and cognitive load: a comparative study
    Fuoad, Sura Ali
    El-Sayed, Walid
    Marei, Hesham
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [40] Student peer reviewers' views on teaching innovations and imaginative learning
    Chan, Zenobia C. Y.
    NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2016, 39 : 155 - 160