Measurement of muscle contraction timing for prosthesis control: a comparison between electromyography and force-myography

被引:21
作者
Esposito, Daniele [1 ]
Gargiulo, Gaetano Dario [2 ]
Parajuli, Nawadita [2 ]
Cesarelli, Giuseppe [3 ]
Andreozzi, Emilio [1 ]
Bifulco, Paolo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Naples Federico II, Polytech & Basic Sci Sch, Dept Elect Engn & Informat Technol, Naples, Italy
[2] Western Sydney Univ, Sch Comp Engn & Math, Penrith, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Naples Federico II, Dept Chem Mat & Prod Engn, Naples, Italy
来源
2020 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON MEDICAL MEASUREMENTS AND APPLICATIONS (MEMEA) | 2020年
关键词
Electromyography (EMG); active prosthesis control; muscle contraction monitoring; Force Sensitive Resistor (FSR) sensor; FSR vs EMG comparison; HUMAN SKELETAL-MUSCLE; ELECTROMECHANICAL DELAY; EMG;
D O I
10.1109/memea49120.2020.9137313
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Active hand prostheses are usually controlled by electromyography (EMG) signals acquired from few muscles available in the residual limb. In general, it is necessary to estimate the envelope of the EMG in real-time to implement the control of the prosthesis. Recently, sensors based on Force Sensitive Resistor (FSR) proved to be a valid alternative to monitor muscle contraction. However, FSR-based sensors measure the mechanical phenomena related to muscle contraction rather than those electrical. The aim of this study is to test the difference between the EMG and force signal in controlling a prosthetic hand. Particular emphasis has been placed on verify the prosthesis activation speed and their application to fast grabbing hand prosthesis as the "Federica" hand. Indeed, there is an intrinsic electro-mechanical delay during muscle contraction, since the electrical activation of muscle fibres always precedes their mechanical contraction. However, the EMG signal needs to be processed to control prosthesis and such filtering unavoidably causes a delay. On the contrary the force signal doesn't need any processing. Both EMG and force signals were simultaneously recorded from the flexor carpi ulnaris muscle, while subject performed wrist flexions. The raw EMG signals were rectified and low-pass filtered to extract their envelopes. Different widespread operators were used: Moving Average, Root Mean Square, Butterworth low-pass; the cut-off frequency was set to 5 Hz. Afterward, a classic double threshold method was used to compute the muscle contraction onsets (i.e. the signal should exceed a threshold level for a certain time period). Results showed that the lag introduced by the low-pass filtering of the rectified EMG, generates delays greater than those associated with the force sensor. This analysis confirms the possibility of using force sensors as a convenient alternative to EMG signals in the control of prostheses.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[11]   A Piezoresistive Sensor to Measure Muscle Contraction and Mechanomyography [J].
Esposito, Daniele ;
Andreozzi, Emilio ;
Fratini, Antonio ;
Gargiulo, Gaetano D. ;
Savino, Sergio ;
Niola, Vincenzo ;
Bifulco, Paolo .
SENSORS, 2018, 18 (08)
[12]   Passive stretching effects on electromechanical delay and time course of recovery in human skeletal muscle: new insights from an electromyographic and mechanomyographic combined approach [J].
Esposito, Fabio ;
Limonta, Eloisa ;
Ce, Emiliano .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 2011, 111 (03) :485-495
[13]  
Ferris-Hood K, 1996, Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol, V36, P157
[14]   Dry electrode Bio-potential Recordings [J].
Gargiulo, Gaetano ;
Bifulco, Paolo ;
McEwan, Alistair ;
Tehrani, Joubin Nasehi ;
Calvo, Rafael A. ;
Romano, Maria ;
Ruffo, Mariano ;
Shephard, Richard ;
Cesarelli, Mario ;
Jin, Craig ;
Mohamed, Armin ;
van Schaik, Andre .
2010 ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY (EMBC), 2010, :6493-6496
[15]   Problems in Assessment of Novel Biopotential Front-End with Dry Electrode: A Brief Review [J].
Gargiulo, Gaetano D. ;
Bifulco, Paolo ;
Cesarelli, Mario ;
Fratini, Antonio ;
Romano, Maria .
MACHINES, 2014, 2 (01) :87-98
[16]   A comparison of computer-based methods for the determination of onset of muscle contraction using electromyography [J].
Hodges, PW ;
Bui, BH .
ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND MOTOR CONTROL-ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1996, 101 (06) :511-519
[17]  
Kamen G., 2010, Essentials of Electromyography
[18]   Myoelectric control systems-A survey [J].
Oskoei, Mohammadreza Asghari ;
Hu, Huosheng .
BIOMEDICAL SIGNAL PROCESSING AND CONTROL, 2007, 2 (04) :275-294
[19]   Real-Time EMG Based Pattern Recognition Control for Hand Prostheses: A Review on Existing Methods, Challenges and Future Implementation [J].
Parajuli, Nawadita ;
Sreenivasan, Neethu ;
Bifulco, Paolo ;
Cesarelli, Mario ;
Savino, Sergio ;
Niola, Vincenzo ;
Esposito, Daniele ;
Hamilton, Tara J. ;
Naik, Ganesh R. ;
Gunawardana, Upul ;
Gargiulo, Gaetano D. .
SENSORS, 2019, 19 (20)
[20]   Underlying Physics of Conductive Polymer Composites and Force Sensing Resistors (FSRs). A Study on Creep Response and Dynamic Loading [J].
Paredes-Madrid, Leonel ;
Matute, Arnaldo ;
Bareno, Jorge O. ;
Parra Vargas, Carlos A. ;
Gutierrez Velasquez, Elkin I. .
MATERIALS, 2017, 10 (11)