'Just culture:' Improving safety by achieving substantive, procedural and restorative justice

被引:104
作者
Dekker, Sidney W. A. [1 ]
Breakey, Hugh [1 ]
机构
[1] Griffith Univ, Brisbane, Qld 4111, Australia
关键词
Just culture; Accountability; Human error; Violations; Restorative justice; SYSTEMS; WORKING; INJURY; PEOPLE; HEALTH; RULES; NEED;
D O I
10.1016/j.ssci.2016.01.018
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
A 'just culture' aims to respond to anxiety about blame-free approaches on the one hand, and a concern about people's willingness to keep reporting safety-related issues on the other. A just culture sets out the conditions that legitimize managerial intervention in the sanction or restoration of individuals in the organization. In this paper we examine the manifestly important moral and safety issues that a just culture needs to consider. These include substantive justice which prescribes how regulations, rules and procedures themselves are fair and legitimate; procedural justice which sets down processes for determining rule-breaches, offers protections for the accused, and governs who should make such determinations; and restorative justice which aims to restore the status of the individual involved and heal relationships and injuries of victims and the wider community in the wake of an ethical breach. Just culture approaches need to provide such foundations for a genuinely just safety culture, to be conducive to reporting, engagement and safety improvement. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:187 / 193
页数:7
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2010, HUMAN ERROR
[2]  
[Anonymous], GAO12329
[3]  
[Anonymous], SAF SCI
[4]  
[Anonymous], MULTINATIONAL MONITO
[5]  
Ashford J.B., 2014, DEATH PENALTY MITIGA
[6]  
Bendersky C, 1998, NEGOTIATION J, V14, P307
[7]  
Bentham J., 1995, PUNISHMENT REHABILIT, P21
[8]  
Bergstrom J., 2009, Journal of Maritime Research, V6, P75
[9]  
Berlinger N., 2003, HASTINGS CTR REPORT
[10]  
Braithwaite J., 1989, Crime