Quantitative evaluation of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for differentiation of renal cell carcinoma subtypes and angiomyolipoma

被引:30
作者
Li, Cui-xian [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lu, Qing [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Huang, Bei-jian [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Xue, Li-yun [1 ,2 ]
Yan, Li-xia [1 ,2 ]
Zheng, Feng-yang [1 ,2 ]
Wen, Jie-xian [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Wen-ping [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Dept Ultrasonol, Zhongshan Hosp, 180 Fenglin Rd, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Shanghai Inst Med Imaging, 180 Fenglin Rd, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
[3] Fudan Univ, Ultrason Med & Engn Res Inst, 180 Fenglin Rd, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Quantitative analysis; Contrast-enhanced ultrasound; Renal cell carcinoma; Angiomyolipoma; Subtype; MINIMAL FAT; MASSES; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; CT; DIAGNOSIS; PERFUSION; CANCER; VEGF; US;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.01.009
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To investigate the value of quantitative parameters of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the differentiation of subtypes of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and angiomyolipoma (AML). Methods: The quantitative characteristics of 341 RCCs and 88 AMLs were analyzed with quantitative software (SonoLiver). Quantitative analysis was conducted in the whole tumor (ROItumor) and the maximum enhanced area of the tumor (ROImax), acquiring the parameters of maximum intensity (IMAX), rise time (RT), time to peak (TTP), mean transit time (mTT), and area under the curve (AUC), were derived and analyzed. The difference values between ROImax and normal renal cortex (Delta Par.s, including Delta IMAX, Delta RT, Delta TTP, Delta mTT, Delta AUC) were compared among renal histotypes. Results: All time-related parameters (including RT, TTP and mTT) of ROImax were shorter than the corresponding parameters of ROItumor in RCC subtypes (all p < 0.05), but made no statistical difference in AMLs (all p > 0.05). There were significant differences of all Delta Par.s among RCC subtypes and AML (all p < 0.01). Delta IMAX and Delta AUC showed the trend that ccRCC >AML > pRCC = chRCC. Delta TTP showed AML = pRCC= chRCC > ccRCC, Delta RT and Delta mTT showed AML > pRCC = chRCC= ccRCC. Delta mTT could distinguish RCC from AML with the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.86. The AUC of Delta IMAX and Delta AUC was 0.89 and 0.92 vs 0.85 and 0.85 for discriminating between pRCC (or chRCC) and AML vs ccRCC and AML. Conclusions: Quantitative analysis of CEUS is a useful modality in AML and RCC subtypes' differentiation, by using Delta mTT, Delta IMAX and Delta AUC. (c) 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:795 / 802
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Contrast-enhanced ultrasound using a time-intensity curve for the diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma
    Aoki, Shigeyuki
    Hattori, Ryohei
    Yamamoto, Tokunori
    Funahashi, Yasuhito
    Matsukawa, Yoshihisa
    Gotoh, Momokazu
    Yamada, Yoshiaki
    Honda, Nobuaki
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 108 (03) : 349 - 354
  • [2] Complex cystic renal masses: Characterization with contrast-enhanced US
    Ascenti, Giorgio
    Mazziotti, Silvio
    Zimbaro, Giovanni
    Settineri, Nicola
    Magno, Carlo
    Melloni, Darwin
    Caruso, Rosario
    Scribano, Emanuele
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2007, 243 (01) : 158 - 165
  • [3] QUANTIFICATION OF ENHANCEMENT OF RENAL PARENCHYMAL MASSES WITH CONTRAST-ENHANCED ULTRASOUND
    Cai, Yingyu
    Du, Lianfang
    Li, Fan
    Gu, Jiying
    Bai, Min
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2014, 40 (07) : 1387 - 1393
  • [4] Histogram Analysis of Small Solid Renal Masses: Differentiating Minimal Fat Angiomyolipoma From Renal Cell Carcinoma
    Chaudhry, Humaira S.
    Davenport, Matthew S.
    Nieman, Christopher M.
    Ho, Lisa M.
    Neville, Amy M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2012, 198 (02) : 377 - 383
  • [5] Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) -: Update 2008
    Claudon, M.
    Cosgrove, D.
    Albrecht, T.
    Bolondi, L.
    Bosio, M.
    Calliada, F.
    Correas, J. -M.
    Darge, K.
    Dietrich, C.
    D'Onofrio, M.
    Evans, D. H.
    Filice, C.
    Greiner, L.
    Jaeger, K.
    de Jong, N.
    Leen, E.
    Lencioni, R.
    Lindsell, D.
    Martegani, A.
    Meairs, S.
    Nolsoe, C.
    Piscaglia, F.
    Ricci, P.
    Seidel, G.
    Skjoldbye, B.
    Solbiati, L.
    Thorelius, L.
    Tranquart, F.
    Weskott, H. P.
    Whittingham, T.
    [J]. ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN, 2008, 29 (01): : 28 - 44
  • [6] Contrast-enhanced ultrasound performed under urgent conditions. Indications, review of the technique, clinical examples and limitations
    Cokkinos D.D.
    Antypa E.
    Kalogeropoulos I.
    Tomais D.
    Ismailos E.
    Matsiras I.
    Benakis S.
    Piperopoulos P.N.
    [J]. Insights into Imaging, 2013, 4 (2) : 185 - 198
  • [7] Differentiation of Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma Subtypes on CT and MRI
    Egbert, Nathan D.
    Caoili, Elaine M.
    Cohan, Richard H.
    Davenport, Matthew S.
    Francis, Isaac R.
    Kunju, L. Priya
    Ellis, James H.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2013, 201 (02) : 347 - 355
  • [8] Reproducibility of Quantitative Assessment of Altered Hepatic Hemodynamics With Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound
    Gauthier, Thomas P.
    Muhammad, Aun
    Wasan, Harpreet S.
    Abel, Paul D.
    Leen, Edward L. S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2012, 31 (09) : 1413 - 1420
  • [9] Correlation between pathologic features and perfusion CT of renal cancer: a feasibility study
    Giglil, Francesca
    Zattonil, Fabio
    Zamboni, Giulia
    Valottol, Claudio
    Bernardin, Livia
    Mucelli, Roberto Pozzi
    Zattonil, Filiberto
    [J]. UROLOGIA JOURNAL, 2010, 77 (04) : 223 - 231
  • [10] Noninvasive Contrast-enhanced US Quantitative Assessment of Tumor Microcirculation in a Murine Model: Effect of Discontinuing Anti-VEGF Therapy
    Guibal, Aymeric
    Taillade, Laurent
    Mule, Sebastien
    Comperat, Eva
    Badachi, Yasmina
    Golmard, Jean Louis
    Le Guillou-Buffello, Delphine
    Rixe, Olivier
    Bridal, S. Lori
    Lucidarme, Olivier
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2010, 254 (02) : 420 - 429