Impact of guideline-based use of uPA/PAI-1 on patient outcome in intermediate-risk early breast cancer

被引:12
作者
Kolben, Thomas [1 ,2 ]
Augustine, D. [3 ]
Armbrust, R. [4 ]
Kolben, T. M. [1 ,2 ]
Degenhardt, T. [1 ,2 ]
Burgmann, M. [1 ,2 ]
Goess, C. [1 ,2 ]
Ditsch, N. [1 ,2 ]
Kates, R. [5 ]
Harbeck, N. [1 ,2 ]
Wuerstlein, R. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Munich, Univ Hosp Munich Grosshadern, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Breast Ctr, Marchioninistr 15, D-81377 Munich, Germany
[2] Univ Munich, Univ Hosp Munich Grosshadern, Comprehens Canc Ctr LMU, Marchioninistr 15, D-81377 Munich, Germany
[3] Hosp Deggendorf, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Breast Ctr, Deggendorf, Germany
[4] Charite, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Berlin, Germany
[5] REK Consulting, Otterfing, Germany
关键词
Intermediate-risk breast cancer; uPA/PAI-1; Outcome; PLASMINOGEN-ACTIVATOR; INHIBITOR PAI-1; ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; AMERICAN SOCIETY; BIOMARKERS UPA; THERAPY; TRIAL; RECOMMENDATIONS; UPDATE;
D O I
10.1007/s10549-015-3653-3
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of guideline-based prospective use of uPA/PAI-1 on clinical outcome in an intermediate-risk cohort of breast cancer patients. We analyzed 381 consecutive primary breast cancer patients (2003-2011) at the breast center Ostbayern meeting the following criteria: MO/NO/estrogen receptor (ER)+/G2. Clinical pathological data, uPA/PAI-1, and follow-up data were collected. Decisions for adjuvant chemotherapy were made upon consideration of prospectively measured uPA/PAI-1. Observed disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated by Kaplan Meier estimates. Using guideline -based analysis of uPA/PAI-1, treatment with adjuvant chemotherapy was avoided in 86.5 % of patients with low uPA/PAI-1, i.e., 38.8 % of the total patient collective. Median follow-up was 52.5 months. Five-year relapse-free survival in intermediate-risk patients (NO, G2) without chemotherapy was 99 %. Five-year overall survival including all causes of death was 95 %. By using uPA/PAI-1, adjuvant chemotherapy can be avoided in a major part of patients with intermediate-risk breast cancer. Nevertheless, DFS and OS of these patients at 5 years remain excellent. The potential, but hardly measurable, benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy has to be set in contrast with its associated side effects and increased morbidity. Patients with high uPA/PAI-1 show benefit from chemotherapy. In this subgroup, a very good OS was observed as well. These findings strongly support the use of uPA/PAI-1 together with clinic-pathological parameters as an evidence -based, clinically relevant and inexpensive decision tool in the routine of a breast center.
引用
收藏
页码:109 / 115
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Abe O, 2005, LANCET, V366, P2087, DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)66544-0
  • [2] Carriero MV, 2011, CURR PHARM DESIGN, V17, P1944
  • [3] The urokinase plasminogen activator system: Role in malignancy
    Duffy, MJ
    [J]. CURRENT PHARMACEUTICAL DESIGN, 2004, 10 (01) : 39 - 49
  • [4] Strategies for subtypes-dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2011
    Goldhirsch, A.
    Wood, W. C.
    Coates, A. S.
    Gelber, R. D.
    Thuerlimann, B.
    Senn, H. -J.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2011, 22 (08) : 1736 - 1747
  • [5] AGO Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Advanced and Metastatic Breast Cancer: Update 2014
    Hanf, Volker
    Schuetz, Florian
    Liedtke, Cornelia
    Thill, Marc
    [J]. BREAST CARE, 2014, 9 (03) : 202 - 209
  • [6] Ten-year analysis of the prospective multicentre Chemo-N0 trial validates American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)-recommended biomarkers uPA and PAI-1 for therapy decision making in node-negative breast cancer patients
    Harbeck, N.
    Schmitt, M.
    Meisner, C.
    Friedel, C.
    Untch, M.
    Schmidt, M.
    Sweep, C. G. J.
    Lisboa, B. W.
    Lux, M. P.
    Beck, T.
    Hasmueller, S.
    Kiechle, M.
    Jaenicke, F.
    Thomssen, C.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 49 (08) : 1825 - 1835
  • [7] Harbeck N, 2002, CANCER RES, V62, P4617
  • [8] American society of clinical oncology 2007 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in breast cancer
    Harris, Lyndsay
    Fritsche, Herbert
    Mennel, Robert
    Norton, Larry
    Ravdin, Peter
    Taube, Sheila
    Somerfield, Mark R.
    Hayes, Daniel F.
    Bast, Robert C., Jr.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (33) : 5287 - 5312
  • [9] Health economic impact of risk group selection according to ASCO-recommended biomarkers uPA/PAI-1 in node-negative primary breast cancer
    Jacobs, Volker R.
    Kates, Ronald E.
    Kantelhardt, Eva
    Vetter, Martina
    Wuerstlein, Rachel
    Fischer, Thorsten
    Schmitt, Manfred
    Jaenicke, Fritz
    Untch, Michael
    Thomssen, Christoph
    Harbeck, Nadia
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2013, 138 (03) : 839 - 850
  • [10] UROKINASE (UPA) AND ITS INHIBITOR PAI-1 ARE STRONG AND INDEPENDENT PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN NODE-NEGATIVE BREAST-CANCER
    JANICKE, F
    SCHMITT, M
    PACHE, L
    ULM, K
    HARBECK, N
    HOFLER, H
    GRAEFF, H
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 1993, 24 (03) : 195 - 208