Determination and evaluation of minimum miscibility pressure using various methods: experimental, visual observation, and simulation

被引:12
作者
Abdurrahman, Muslim [1 ]
Bae, Wisup [2 ]
Permadi, Asep Kurnia [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Islam Riau, Dept Petr Engn, Pekanbaru, Indonesia
[2] Sejong Univ, Dept Energy & Mineral Resources Engn, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Inst Teknol Bandung, Dept Petr Engn, Bandung, Indonesia
来源
OIL & GAS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-REVUE D IFP ENERGIES NOUVELLES | 2019年 / 74卷
关键词
INTERFACIAL-TENSION; CO2;
D O I
10.2516/ogst/2019028
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
This research proposes a simultaneous technique using various methods to yield the most reliable Minimum Miscibility Pressure (MMP) value. Several methods have been utilized in this study including slim tube test, swelling test, vanishing interfacial tension test, visual observation during swelling test and vanishing interfacial tension test, and simulation. The proposed method may reduce the uncertainty and avoid doubtful MMP. The method can also demonstrate discrepancies among the results. There were two samples used in this study namely Crude Oil AB-5 and Crude Oil AB-4. It showed that for Crude Oil AB-5 the discrepancies among the results from that of the slim tube test were between 3.9% and 10.4% and 0% and 5.9% for the temperature of 60 degrees C and 66 degrees C, respectively. The highest discrepancy was shown by the results from the visual observation during vanishing interfacial tension test and the lowest discrepancy was shown by the results from the swelling test. The vanishing interfacial tension test was found to be the fastest method for predicting the MMP. The method also consumed a smaller amount of oil and gas samples for the experiment. The simultaneous method proposed in this study is considered as more proper and exhibits a valuable method for predicting the MMP. This technique has never been found to be performed by previous researchers and accordingly it becomes the strong point of this study to contribute to the global research in the area of MMP determination.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   An improved method for estimating minimum miscibility pressure through condensation-extraction process under swelling tests [J].
Abdurrahman, Muslim ;
Permadi, A. K. ;
Bae, W. S. .
JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2015, 131 :165-171
[2]  
Ahmed T., 2000, P CANADIAN INT PETRO, DOI [10.2118/2000-001, DOI 10.2118/2000-001]
[3]   Predicting CO2 Minimum Miscibility Pressure (MMP) Using Alternating Conditional Expectation (ACE) Algorithm [J].
Alomair, O. ;
Malallah, A. ;
Elsharkawy, A. ;
Iqbal, M. .
OIL & GAS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-REVUE D IFP ENERGIES NOUVELLES, 2015, 70 (06) :967-982
[4]  
[Anonymous], SPE MONOGRAPH SERIES
[5]  
Ayirala SubhashC., 2006, SPE/DOE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, V99606, DOI DOI 10.2118/99606-MS
[6]  
Christiansen R.L., 1987, SPE 13114 SPE RESERV, V2, P523, DOI [10.2118/13114-PA, DOI 10.2118/13114-PA]
[7]  
CMG Software, 2014, WINPROP US GUID
[8]  
Cronquist C., 1978, US DOE ANN S TULS, V35, P981
[9]  
Danesh A., 2007, PVT and Phase Behaviour of Petroleum Reservoir Fluids
[10]  
Dong M, 2000, J CAN PETROL TECHNOL, V39, P53