Viability of SARS-CoV-2 in river water and wastewater at different temperatures and solids content

COVID-19 patients can excrete viable SARS-CoV-2 virus via urine and faeces, which has raised concerns over the possibility of COVID-19 transmission via aerosolized contaminated water or via the faecal-oral route. These concerns are especially exacerbated in many low-and middle-income countries, where untreated sewage is frequently discharged to surface waters. SARS-CoV-2 RNA has been detected in river water (RW) and raw wastewater (WW) samples. However, little is known about SARS-CoV-2 viability in these environmental matrices. Determining the persistence of SARS-CoV-2 in water under different environmental conditions is of great importance for basic assumptions in quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA). In this study, the persistence of SARS-CoV-2 was assessed using plaque assays following spiking of RW and WW samples with infectious SARS-CoV-2 that was previously isolated from a COVID19 patient. These assays were carried out on autoclaved RW and WW samples, filtered (0.22 mu m) and unfiltered, at 4 degrees C and 24 degrees C. Linear and nonlinear regression models were adjusted to the data. The Weibull regression model achieved the lowest root mean square error (RMSE) and was hence chosen to estimate T 90 and T 99 (time required for 1 log and 2 log reductions, respectively). SARS-CoV-2 remained viable longer in filtered compared with unfiltered samples. RW and WW showed T 90 values of 1.9 and 1.2 day and T 99 values of 6.4 and 4.0 days, respectively. When samples were filtered through 0.22 mu m pore size membranes, T 90 values increased to 3.3 and 1.5 days, and T 99 increased to 8.5 and 4.5 days, for RW and WW samples, respectively. Remarkable increases in SARS-CoV-2 persistence were observed in assays at 4 degrees C, which showed T 90 values of 7.7 and 5.5 days, and T 99 values of 18.7 and 17.5 days for RW and WW, respectively. These results highlight the variability of SARS-CoV-2 persistence in water and wastewater matrices and can be highly relevant to effort s aimed at quantifying water-related risks, which could be valuable for understanding and controlling the pandemic. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. COVID-19 patients can excrete viable SARS-CoV-2 virus via urine and faeces, which has raised concerns over the possibility of COVID-19 transmission via aerosolized contaminated water or via the faecal-oral route. These concerns are especially exacerbated in many low- and middle-income countries, where untreated sewage is frequently discharged to surface waters. SARS-CoV-2 RNA has been detected in river water (RW) and raw wastewater (WW) samples. However, little is known about SARS-CoV-2 viability in these environmental matrices. Determining the persistence of SARS-CoV-2 in water under different environmental conditions is of great importance for basic assumptions in quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA). In this study, the persistence of SARS-CoV-2 was assessed using plaque assays following spiking of RW and WW samples with infectious SARS-CoV-2 that was previously isolated from a COVID19 patient. These assays were carried out on autoclaved RW and WW samples, filtered (0.22 ?m) and unfiltered, at 4 ?C and 24 ?C. Linear and nonlinear regression models were adjusted to the data. The Weibull regression model achieved the lowest root mean square error (RMSE) and was hence chosen to estimate T 90 and T 99 (time required for 1 log and 2 log reductions, respectively). SARS-CoV-2 remained viable longer in filtered compared with unfiltered samples. RW and WW showed T 90 values of 1.9 and 1.2 day and T 99 values of 6.4 and 4.0 days, respectively. When samples were filtered through 0.22 ?m pore size membranes, T 90 values increased to 3.3 and 1.5 days, and T 99 increased to 8.5 and 4.5 days, for RW and WW samples, respectively. Remarkable increases in SARS-CoV-2 persistence were observed in assays at 4 ?C, which showed T 90 values of 7.7 and 5.5 days, and T 99 values of 18.7 and 17.5 days for RW and WW, respectively. These results highlight the variability of SARS-CoV-2 persistence in water and wastewater matrices and can be highly relevant to effort s aimed at quantifying water-related risks, which could be valuable for understanding and controlling the pandemic.