Comparison between EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology and EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy histology for the evaluation of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

被引:81
|
作者
Crino, Stefano Francesco [1 ]
Ammendola, Serena [2 ]
Meneghetti, Anna [1 ]
Bernardoni, Laura [1 ]
Bellocchi, Maria Cristina Conti [1 ]
Gabbrielli, Armando [1 ]
Landoni, Luca [3 ]
Paiella, Salvatore [3 ]
Pin, Federico [1 ]
Parisi, Alice [2 ]
Mastrosimini, Maria Gaia [2 ]
Amodio, Antonio [1 ]
Frulloni, Luca [1 ]
Facciorusso, Antonio [4 ]
Larghi, Alberto [5 ]
Manfrin, Erminia [2 ]
机构
[1] GB Rossi Univ Hosp, Pancreas Inst, Gastroenterol & Digest Endoscopy Unit, Verona, Italy
[2] GB Rossi Univ Hosp, Dept Diagnost & Publ Hlth, Verona, Italy
[3] Univ Verona Hosp Trust, Pancreas Inst, Dept Gen & Pancreat Surg, Verona, Italy
[4] Univ Foggia, Dept Med Sci, Digest Endoscopy Unit, Foggia, Italy
[5] IRCCS, Digest Endoscopy Unit, Fdn Policlin Univ A Gemelli, Rome, Italy
关键词
Ki-67 proliferative index; Pancreatic surgery; Small pNET; Endoscopic ultrasound tissue acquisition;
D O I
10.1016/j.pan.2020.12.015
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background/objectives: Studies comparing EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) with EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) for the evaluation of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) are lacking. We aimed at comparing EUS-FNA with EUS-FNB in terms of Ki-67 proliferative index (PI) estimation capability, cellularity of the samples, and reliability of Ki-67 PI/tumor grading compared with surgical specimens. Methods: Patients diagnosed with pNETs on EUS and/or surgical specimens were retrospectively identified. Specimens were re-evaluated to assess Ki-67 PI feasibility, sample cellularity by manual counting, and determination of Ki-67 PI value. Outcomes in the EUS-FNA and EUS-FNB groups were compared. Kendall rank test was used for Ki-67 PI correlation between EUS and surgical specimens. Subgroup analysis including small (<= 20 mm), non-functioning pNETs was performed. Results: Three-hundred samples from 292 lesions were evaluated: 69 EUS-FNA cytology and 231 EUS-FNB histology. Ki-67 PI feasibility was similar for EUS-FNA and EUS-FNB (91.3% vs. 95.7%, p = 0.15), while EUS-FNB performed significantly better in the subgroup of 179 small pNETs (88.2% vs. 96.1%, p = 0.04). Rate of poor cellulated (<500 cells) specimens was equal between EUS-FNA and EUS-FNB. A significant correlation for Ki-67 PI values between EUS and 92 correspondent surgical specimens was found in both groups, but it was stronger with EUS-FNB (tau = 0.626, p < 0.0001 vs. tau = 0.452, p = 0.031). Correct grading estimation was comparable between the two groups (p = 0.482). Conclusion: Our study showed stronger correlation for Ki-67 values between EUS-FNB and surgical specimens, and that EUS-FNB outperformed EUS-FNA in the evaluation of small pNETs. EUS-FNB should become standard of care for grading assessment of suspected pNETs. (C) 2020 IAP and EPC. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:443 / 450
页数:8
相关论文
共 3 条
  • [1] Endoscopic Ultrasonography-Guided Fine-Needle Biopsy for Patients with Resectable Pancreatic Malignancies
    Chien, Ming-Sheng
    Lin, Ching-Chung
    Lai, Jian-Han
    GASTROENTEROLOGY INSIGHTS, 2024, 15 (02) : 375 - 385
  • [2] Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Biopsy With or Without Rapid On-site Evaluation for Diagnosis of Solid Pancreatic Lesions: A Randomized Controlled Non-Inferiority Trial
    Crino, Stefano Francesco
    Di Mitri, Roberto
    Nguyen, Nam Q.
    Tarantino, Ilaria
    de Nucci, Germana
    Deprez, Pierre H.
    Carrara, Silvia
    Kitano, Masayuki
    Shami, Vanessa M.
    Fernandez-Esparrach, Gloria
    Poley, Jan-Werner
    Baldaque-Silva, Francisco
    Itoi, Takao
    Manfrin, Erminia
    Bernardoni, Laura
    Gabbrielli, Armando
    Conte, Elisabetta
    Unti, Elettra
    Naidu, Jeevinesh
    Ruszkiewicz, Andrew
    Amata, Michele
    Liotta, Rosa
    Manes, Gianpiero
    Di Nuovo, Franca
    Borbath, Ivan
    Komuta, Mina
    Lamonaca, Laura
    Rahal, Daoud
    Hatamaru, Keiichi
    Itonaga, Masahiro
    Rizzatti, Gianenrico
    Costamagna, Guido
    Inzani, Frediano
    Curatolo, Mariangela
    Strand, Daniel S.
    Wang, Andrew Y.
    Gines, Angels
    Sendino, Oriol
    Signoretti, Marianna
    van Driel, Lydi M. J. W.
    Dolapcsiev, Karoly
    Matsunami, Yukitoshi
    van der Merwe, Schalk
    van Malenstein, Hannah
    Locatelli, Francesca
    Correale, Loredana
    Scarpa, Aldo
    Larghi, Alberto
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 161 (03) : 899 - +
  • [3] Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) versus macroscopic on-site evaluation (MOSE) for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic lesions: a paired comparative analysis using newer-generation fine needle biopsy needles
    Sundaram, Sridhar
    Chhanchure, Utkarsh
    Patil, Prachi
    Seth, Vishal
    Mahajan, Akhil
    Bal, Munita
    Kaushal, Rajiv Kumar
    Ramadwar, Mukta
    Prabhudesai, Neelam
    Bhandare, Manish
    Shrikhande, Shailesh V.
    Mehta, Shaesta
    ANNALS OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2023, 36 (03): : 340 - 346