User perception and experience of the introduction of a novel critical care patient viewer in the ICU setting

被引：20

作者：

Dziadzko, Mikhail A. ^{[1
]}

Herasevich, Vitaly ^{[1
]}

Sen, Ayan ^{[2
]}

Pickering, Brian W. ^{[1
]}

Knight, Ann-Marie A. ^{[3
]}

Franco, Pablo Moreno ^{[3
,4
]}

机构：

[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Anesthesiol, Rochester, MN USA

[2] Mayo Clin, Div Pulm & Crit Care Med, Scottsdale, AZ USA

[3] Mayo Clin, Div Crit Care Med, 4500 San Pablo Rd, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA

[4] Mayo Clin, Dept Transplantat Med, 4500 San Pablo Rd, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA

来源：

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS | 2016年 / 88卷

关键词：

Electronic medical record; Implementation; Intensive care unit; Rounds; Usability; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL-RECORD; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; CLINICAL INFORMATION; PERFORMANCE; ACCEPTANCE; INTERFACES; COGNITION; NURSES; MODEL;

D O I：

10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.01.011

中图分类号：

TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];

学科分类号：

0812 ;

摘要：

Objective: Failure to rapidly identify high-value information due to inappropriate output may alter user acceptance and satisfaction. The information needs for different intensive care unit (ICU) providers are not the same. This can obstruct successful implementation of electronic medical record (EMR) systems. We evaluated the implementation experience and satisfaction of providers using a novel EMR interface based on the information needs of ICU providers in the context of an existing EMR system. Methods: This before-after study was performed in the ICU setting at two tertiary care hospitals from October 2013 through November 2014. Surveys were delivered to ICU providers before and after implementation of the novel EMR interface. Overall satisfaction and acceptance was reported for both interfaces. Results: A total of 246 before (existing EMR) and 115 after (existing EMR + novel EMR interface) surveys were analyzed. 14% of respondents were prescribers and 86% were non-prescribers. Non-prescribers were more satisfied with the existing EMR, whereas prescribers were more satisfied with the novel EMR interface. Both groups reported easier data gathering, routine tasks & rounding, and fostering of team work with the novel EMR interface. This interface was the primary tool for 18% of respondents after implementation and 73% of respondents intended to use it further. Non-prescribers reported an intention to use this novel interface as their primary tool for information gathering. Conclusion: Compliance and acceptance of new system is not related to previous duration of work in ICU, but ameliorates with the length of EMR interface usage. Task-specific and role-specific considerations are necessary for design and successful implementation of a EMR interface. The difference in user workflows causes disparity of the way of EMR data usage. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：86 / 91

页数：6

共 33 条

[1] The effect of two different electronic health record user interfaces on intensive care provider task load, errors of cognition, and performance [J].