A prospective study of analgesic quality after a thoracotomy: paravertebral block with ropivacaine before and after rib spreading

被引:17
作者
Fibla, Juan J. [1 ]
Molins, Laureano [1 ]
Manuel Mier, Jose [1 ]
Sierra, Ana [2 ]
Vidal, Gonzalo [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Univ Sagrat Cor, Dept Thorac Surg, Barcelona 08029, Spain
[2] Hosp Univ Sagrat Cor, Dept Anesthesia, Barcelona 08029, Spain
关键词
Post-thoracotomy pain; Paravertebral block; Pre-emptive analgesia; INTERCOSTAL NERVE BLOCK; PREEMPTIVE ANALGESIA; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; CENTRAL SENSITIZATION; BUPIVACAINE; RELIEF; 0.5-PERCENT; MANAGEMENT; SURGERY; STRESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.05.041
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: Paravertebral block (PVB) is an effective alternative to epidural analgesia in the management of post-thoracotomy pain. Rib spreading (RS) is an important noxious stimulus considered a major cause of post-thoracotomy pain. Our hypothesis was that a bolus of ropivacaine 0.2% through a paravertebral catheter (PVC) inserted before RS could decrease pain during the first 72 postoperative hours. Methods: The methodology employed was to perform a prospective randomised study of 60 consecutive patients submitted to thoracotomy. Patients were divided in two independent groups (anterior thoracotomy (AT) and posterolateral thoracotomy (PT)). A catheter was inserted under direct vision in the thoracic paravertebral space at the level of incision. In each group, patients were randomised to receive a bolus of 20 ml of ropivacaine 0.2% before rib spreading (pre-RS) or after (post-RS), just before closing the thoracotomy. They postoperatively received 15 ml of ropivacaine 0.2% every 6 h combined with methamizol (every 6 h). Subcutaneous meperidine was employed as a rescue drug. The level of pain was measured with the visual analogue scale (VAS) at 1, 6, 24, 48 and 72 h after surgery. The need of meperidine as a rescue drug and secondary effects were also recorded. Results: We did not register secondary effects in relation to the PVC (paravertebral or cutaneous bleeding or haematoma, respiratory depression, cardiotoxicity, confusion, sedation, urinary retention, nausea, vomiting or pruritus). Seven patients (11.6%) needed meperidine as rescue drug (four pre-RS and three post-RS). The mean VAS values were the following: all cases (n = 60): 4.7 +/- 2.0; AT (n = 32): 4.0 +/- 2.1; PT (n = 28): 5.6 +/- 1.8; pre-RS (n = 30): 4.8 +/- 1.9; post-RS (n = 30): 4.6 +/- 2.0; AT-pre-RS (n = 16): 4.1 +/- 2.0; AT-post-RS (n = 16): 3.9 +/- 2.1; PT-pre-RS (n = 14): 5.6 +/- 1.6; PT-post-RS (n = 14): 5.4 +/- 1.7. Conclusions: Post-thoracotomy analgesia combining PVC and a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug is a safe and effective practice. VAS values are acceptable (only 11.6% of patients required meperidine). It prevents the risk of side effects related to epidural analgesia. Patients submitted to AT experienced less pain than those with PT (4.0 vs 5.6; p < 0.01). PVB with ropivacaine before RS got similar VAS values than the block after RS (4.8 vs 4.6; p > 0.05). The moment of the insertion of the PVC does not seem to affect postoperative pain levels. (C) 2009 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:901 / 905
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
[11]   Muscle sparing thoracotomy: a biomechanical analysis confirms preservation of muscle strength but no improvement in wound discomfort [J].
Khan, IH ;
McManus, KG ;
McCraith, A ;
McGuigan, JA .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2000, 18 (06) :656-661
[12]   Pre-emptive analgesia with thoracic paravertebral blockade? [J].
Lönnqvist, PA .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2005, 95 (06) :727-728
[13]   Paravertebral block with ropivacaine 0.5% versus systemic analgesia for pain relief after thoracotomy [J].
Marret, E ;
Bazelly, B ;
Taylor, G ;
Lembert, N ;
Deleuze, A ;
Mazoit, JX ;
Bonnet, FJ .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2005, 79 (06) :2109-2114
[14]   A qualitative and quantitative systematic review of preemptive analgesia for postoperative pain relief - The role of timing of analgesia [J].
Moiniche, S ;
Kehlet, H ;
Dahl, JB .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2002, 96 (03) :725-741
[15]   Nerve-stimulator guided paravertebral blockade vs. general anaesthesia for breast surgery:: a prospective randomized trial [J].
Naja, MZ ;
Ziade, MF ;
Lönnqvist, PA .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2003, 20 (11) :897-903
[16]   A prospective, randomized comparison of preoperative and continuous balanced epidural or paravertebral bupivacaine on post-thoracotomy pain, pulmonary function and stress responses [J].
Richardson, J ;
Sabanathan, S ;
Jones, J ;
Shah, RD ;
Cheema, S ;
Mearns, AJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1999, 83 (03) :387-392
[17]  
RICHARDSON J, 1994, J CARDIOVASC SURG, V35, P219
[18]   Acute pain management for patients undergoing thoracotomy [J].
Soto, RG ;
Fu, ES .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2003, 75 (04) :1349-1357
[19]   AMBULATORY SURGICAL-MANAGEMENT OF BREAST-CARCINOMA USING PARAVERTEBRAL BLOCK [J].
WELTZ, CR ;
GREENGRASS, RA ;
LYERLY, HK .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1995, 222 (01) :19-26
[20]   THE INDUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF CENTRAL SENSITIZATION IS DEPENDENT ON N-METHYL-D-ASPARTIC ACID RECEPTOR ACTIVATION - IMPLICATIONS FOR THE TREATMENT OF POSTINJURY PAIN HYPERSENSITIVITY STATES [J].
WOOLF, CJ ;
THOMPSON, SWN .
PAIN, 1991, 44 (03) :293-299