Study on the mercury emission and transformation in an ultra-low emission coal- fired power plant

被引:105
作者
Zhao, Shilin [1 ]
Duan, Yufeng [1 ]
Yao, Ting [1 ]
Liu, Meng [1 ]
Lu, Jianhong [1 ]
Tan, Houzhang [2 ]
Wang, Xuebin [2 ]
Wu, Lituo [3 ]
机构
[1] Southeast Univ, Sch Energy & Environm, Minist Educ, Key Lab Energy Thermal Convers & Control, Nanjing 210096, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Energy & Power Engn, Xian 710049, Peoples R China
[3] Xian Gerui Power Technol Ltd, Xian 710065, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Mercury emission and removal; Coal-fired power plant; Ultra-low emission; Transformation process; TPDD; TEMPERATURE-PROGRAMMED DESORPTION; CATALYTIC-REDUCTION CATALYSTS; FLUE-GAS; FLY-ASH; ATMOSPHERIC MERCURY; ELEMENTAL MERCURY; OXIDATION; COMBUSTION; SPECIATION; REMOVAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.fuel.2017.03.038
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Mercury emissions from a Chinese ultra-low emission(ULE) coal-fired power plant burning a low chlorine and sulfur bituminous coal was investigated by using the Ontario Hydro method (OHM). A temperature-programmed decomposition desorption (TPDD) instrument, scanning electron microscope (SEM), and X-ray power diffraction spectrometry (XRD) were used to identify the mercury species, apparent morphology, and chemical composition of the coal and combustion by-products. As measured by the OHM, the elemental mercury emitted from the stack is the largest proportion of the total mercury (about 38.95%), almost 13 times more than the oxidized mercury. Mercury in bottom ash was found to be only 0.07% of the incoming total mercury. The elemental mercury was found to oxidize across the SCR, with 45.47% converted to oxidized mercury. This increase in mercury oxidation is significant, as it was shown to be removed by the WFGD system. The total mercury removed across all APCDs in order of most to least was WFGD > ESP > WESP. The WESP was shown to further remove mercury, whose removal rate is about 13.63%, resulting in lower mercury stack emissions. For this plant arrangement, the mercury emission factor was calculated to be 1.56 g/10(12) J, less than the mean value of Chinese plants. The mercury content in the gypsum is higher than the limit (0.50 mg/kg) while bottom and ESP ash were shown to have no effect on the soil. Further investigation of thermal treatment on mercury in gypsum is needed before definitive conclusions on disposal can be drawn. Concentration of mercury measured in the WFGD and WESP waste water is higher than the limit (0.001 mg/L), and more importance should be given on the waste water from WFGD. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:653 / 661
页数:9
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]   Effects of H2O, SO2, and NO on homogeneous Hg oxidation by Cl2 [J].
Agarwal, Hans ;
Stenger, Harvey G. ;
Wu, Song ;
Fan, Zhen .
ENERGY & FUELS, 2006, 20 (03) :1068-1075
[2]  
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), 2002, D678402 ASTM
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, GLOB MERC ASS
[4]  
[Anonymous], 148489 STSB NEPA GBT
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2008, TECHNICAL BACKGROUND
[6]  
[Anonymous], 156181995 STSB NEPA
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2015, 12 PEOPL C C JIANGS
[8]   Speciation of mercury in fly ashes by temperature programmed decomposition [J].
Antonia Lopez-Anton, M. ;
Perry, Ron ;
Abad-Valle, Patricia ;
Diaz-Somoano, Mercedes ;
Rosa Martinez-Tarazona, M. ;
Mercedes Maroto-Valer, M. .
FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 92 (03) :707-711
[9]   Mercury capture by boiler modifications with sub-bituminous coals [J].
Bilirgen, Harun ;
Romero, Carlos .
FUEL, 2012, 94 (01) :361-367
[10]  
Blythe G, 2008, DEFC2604NT42314 NAT