Simultaneous Improvement in the Precision, Accuracy, and Robustness of Label-free Proteome Quantification by Optimizing Data Manipulation Chains

被引:99
作者
Tang, Jing [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Fu, Jianbo [1 ]
Wang, Yunxia [1 ]
Luo, Yongchao [1 ]
Yang, Qingxia [1 ]
Li, Bo [1 ,2 ]
Tu, Gao [1 ,2 ]
Hong, Jiajun [1 ]
Cui, Xuejiao [2 ]
Chen, Yuzong [4 ]
Yao, Lixia [5 ]
Xue, Weiwei [2 ]
Zhu, Feng [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Coll Pharmaceut Sci, Hangzhou 310058, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Chongqing Univ, Sch Pharmaceut Sci, Chongqing 401331, Peoples R China
[3] Chongqing Med Univ, Dept Bioinformat, Chongqing 400016, Peoples R China
[4] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Pharm, Singapore 117543, Singapore
[5] Mayo Clin, Dept Hlth Sci Res, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Label-free quantification; Bioinformatics; Omics; Bioinformatics software; SWATH-MS; Clinical proteomics; Label-free proteome quantification; LFQ workflow; Online tool; Processing chain; Quantification tool; MISSING VALUE ESTIMATION; MASS-SPECTROMETRY; EXPRESSION DATA; QUANTITATIVE PROTEOMICS; COMPUTATIONAL PLATFORM; NORMALIZATION METHODS; GENE-EXPRESSION; SOFTWARE TOOLS; SPECTRAL COUNT; REPRODUCIBILITY;
D O I
10.1074/mcp.RA118.001169
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
High-quality label-free proteome quantification (LFQ) is valuable for clinical and pharmaceutical studies yet remains extremely challenging despite technical advances. Particularly, fluctuating precision, limited robustness, and compromised accuracy are known issues. Here, we described and validated a new strategy enabling the discovery of the LFQs of simultaneously enhanced precision, robustness, and accuracy from thousands of LFQ manipulation chains. In the proof-of-concept study, this strategy showed superior ability in identifying well-performing LFQs. An online tool incorporating this novel strategy was also developed. The label-free proteome quantification (LFQ) is multistep workflow collectively defined by quantification tools and subsequent data manipulation methods that has been extensively applied in current biomedical, agricultural, and environmental studies. Despite recent advances, in-depth and high-quality quantification remains extremely challenging and requires the optimization of LFQs by comparatively evaluating their performance. However, the evaluation results using different criteria (precision, accuracy, and robustness) vary greatly, and the huge number of potential LFQs becomes one of the bottlenecks in comprehensively optimizing proteome quantification. In this study, a novel strategy, enabling the discovery of the LFQs of simultaneously enhanced performance from thousands of workflows (integrating 18 quantification tools with 3,128 manipulation chains), was therefore proposed. First, the feasibility of achieving simultaneous improvement in the precision, accuracy, and robustness of LFQ was systematically assessed by collectively optimizing its multistep manipulation chains. Second, based on a variety of benchmark datasets acquired by various quantification measurements of different modes of acquisition, this novel strategy successfully identified a number of manipulation chains that simultaneously improved the performance across multiple criteria. Finally, to further enhance proteome quantification and discover the LFQs of optimal performance, an online tool (https://idrblab.org/anpela/) enabling collective performance assessment (from multiple perspectives) of the entire LFQ workflow was developed. This study confirmed the feasibility of achieving simultaneous improvement in precision, accuracy, and robustness. The novel strategy proposed and validated in this study together with the online tool might provide useful guidance for the research field requiring the mass-spectrometry-based LFQ technique.
引用
收藏
页码:1683 / 1699
页数:17
相关论文
共 92 条
  • [1] An evaluation of two-channel ChIP-on-chip and DNA methylation microarray normalization strategies
    Adriaens, Michiel E.
    Jaillard, Magali
    Eijssen, Lars M. T.
    Mayer, Claus-Dieter
    Evelo, Chris T. A.
    [J]. BMC GENOMICS, 2012, 13
  • [2] Assessment of Label-Free Quantification in Discovery Proteomics and Impact of Technological Factors and Natural Variability of Protein Abundance
    Al Shweiki, M. H. D. Rami
    Moenchgesang, Susann
    Majovsky, Petra
    Thieme, Domenika
    Trutschel, Diana
    Hoehenwarter, Wolfgang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH, 2017, 16 (04) : 1410 - 1424
  • [3] Faster cyclic loess: normalizing RNA arrays via linear models
    Ballman, KV
    Grill, DE
    Oberg, AL
    Therneau, TM
    [J]. BIOINFORMATICS, 2004, 20 (16) : 2778 - 2786
  • [4] Bacterial viability and culturability
    Barer, MR
    Harwood, CR
    [J]. ADVANCES IN MICROBIAL PHYSIOLOGY, VOL 41, 1999, 41 : 93 - 137
  • [5] Proteomic studies in the discovery of cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
    Barschke, Peggy
    Oeckl, Patrick
    Steinacker, Petra
    Ludolph, Albert
    Otto, Markus
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF PROTEOMICS, 2017, 14 (09) : 769 - 777
  • [6] Data-Driven Sample Size Determination for Metabolic Phenotyping Studies
    Blaise, Benjamin J.
    [J]. ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2013, 85 (19) : 8943 - 8950
  • [7] A multi-model statistical approach for proteomic spectral count quantitation
    Branson, Owen E.
    Freitas, Michael A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROTEOMICS, 2016, 144 : 23 - 32
  • [8] Normalization approaches for removing systematic biases associated with mass spectrometry and label-free proteomics
    Callister, SJ
    Barry, RC
    Adkins, JN
    Johnson, ET
    Qian, WJ
    Webb-Robertson, BJM
    Smith, RD
    Lipton, MS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH, 2006, 5 (02) : 277 - 286
  • [9] Precise Temporal Profiling of Signaling Complexes in Primary Cells Using SWATH Mass Spectrometry
    Caron, Etienne
    Roncagalli, Romain
    Hase, Takeshi
    Wolski, Witold E.
    Choi, Meena
    Menoita, Marisa G.
    Durand, Stephane
    Garcia-Blesa, Antonio
    Fierro-Monti, Ivo
    Sajic, Tatjana
    Heusel, Moritz
    Weiss, Tobias
    Malissen, Marie
    Schlapbach, Ralph
    Collins, Ben C.
    Ghosh, Samik
    Kitano, Hiroaki
    Aebersold, Ruedi
    Malissen, Bernard
    Gstaiger, Matthias
    [J]. CELL REPORTS, 2017, 18 (13): : 3219 - 3226
  • [10] Normalyzer: A Tool for Rapid Evaluation of Normalization Methods for Omics Data Sets
    Chawade, Aakash
    Alexandersson, Erik
    Levander, Fredrik
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH, 2014, 13 (06) : 3114 - 3120