DISTRIBUTION OF THREATENED-UNPROTECTED VERTEBRATES AS A BASIS FOR CONSERVATION PLANNING

被引:6
作者
Dolev, Amit [1 ,2 ]
Carmel, Yohay [1 ]
机构
[1] Technion Israel Inst Technol, Fac Civil & Environm Engn, IL-32000 Haifa, Israel
[2] Soc Protect Nat Israel, Israel Mammals Res Ctr, IL-66183 Tel Aviv, Israel
关键词
threatened species; GAP analysis; species distribution; vertebrates; protected areas; priority areas; Israel; CAPE FLORISTIC REGION; SPECIES RICHNESS; PROTECTED AREAS; PRIORITY AREAS; GAP ANALYSIS; BIODIVERSITY; DIVERSITY; COMPLEMENTARITY; PRIORITIZATION; NETWORKS;
D O I
10.1560/IJEE.55.2.117
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The distribution of threatened species often serves to drive conservation decisions. Much of the distribution of many threatened species is already protected. These species may need fostering, but not necessarily further protected areas. We propose a simple and generic means of assessing the degree of protection presently offered to a threatened species, namely, the proportion of its distribution that is unprotected. This index classifies threatened species into two classes: most of their distribution range is either (1) inside protected areas (protected), or (2) outside of protected areas (unprotected). We propose that evaluation of land for planning and conservation should be based chiefly on the distribution of those threatened species that are not yet protected by the current reserve network. Our approach is exemplified in a case study of vertebrate species in Israel. We constructed a "hotspots map" using only the threatened species that have more than 60% of their distribution unprotected (n = 57), and compared it to a similar map with all threatened vertebrates (n = 118). This latter map had all hotspots around the Rift Valley in the eastern part of the country, while the former map had some hotspots in the western parts of the country as well. This study highlights the importance of a clear decision regarding which species should be used in prioritizing areas for conservation.
引用
收藏
页码:117 / 132
页数:16
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2004, IUCN red list categories and criteria
[2]   Identifying areas of high-value vertebrate diversity for strengthening conservation [J].
Benayas, JMR ;
de la Montaña, E .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2003, 114 (03) :357-370
[3]   Capturing biodiversity: selecting priority areas for conservation using different criteria [J].
Bonn, A ;
Gaston, KJ .
BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2005, 14 (05) :1083-1100
[4]   Threatened and endemic species: are they good indicators of patterns of biodiversity on a national scale? [J].
Bonn, A ;
Rodrigues, ASL ;
Gaston, KJ .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2002, 5 (06) :733-741
[5]   Major gaps in the distribution of protected areas for threatened and narrow range Afrotropical plants [J].
Burgess, N ;
Küper, W ;
Mutke, J ;
Brown, J ;
Westaway, S ;
Turpie, S ;
Meshack, C ;
Taplin, J ;
McClean, C ;
Lovett, JC .
BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2005, 14 (08) :1877-1894
[6]   Factoring species, non-species values and threats into biodiversity prioritisation across the ecoregions of Africa and its islands [J].
Burgess, ND ;
Hales, JD ;
Ricketts, TH ;
Dinerstein, E .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2006, 127 (04) :383-401
[7]   Assessment of current and proposed nature reserves of Mexico based on their capacity to protect geophysical features and biodiversity [J].
Cantú, C ;
Wright, RG ;
Scott, JM ;
Strand, E .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2004, 115 (03) :411-417
[8]   Comparing environmental and biological surrogates for biodiversity at a local scale [J].
Carmel, Yohay ;
Stoller-Cavari, Liron .
ISRAEL JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2006, 52 (01) :11-27
[9]  
Cowling R. M., 1999, Diversity and Distributions, V5, P51, DOI 10.1046/j.1472-4642.1999.00038.x
[10]  
Davis F.W., 1998, CALIFORNIA GAP ANAL