Virtual online consultations: advantages and limitations (VOCAL) study

被引:163
作者
Greenhalgh, Trisha [1 ]
Vijayaraghavan, Shanti [2 ]
Wherton, Joe [3 ]
Shaw, Sara [1 ]
Byrne, Emma [3 ]
Campbell-Richards, Desiree [2 ]
Bhattacharya, Satya [2 ]
Hanson, Philippa [2 ]
Ramoutar, Seendy [2 ]
Gutteridge, Charles [2 ]
Hodkinson, Isabel [4 ]
Collard, Anna [2 ]
Morris, Joanne [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Primary Care Hlth Sci, Oxford, England
[2] Barts Hlth NHS Trust, London, England
[3] Barts & London Queen Marys Sch Med & Dent, Blizard Inst, London, England
[4] Tower Hamlets Clin Commissioning Grp, London, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2016年 / 6卷 / 01期
关键词
HEALTH-CARE; NHS DIRECT; FOLLOW-UP; EMAIL CONSULTATIONS; TELEPHONE TRIAGE; BEHAVIOR-CHANGE; CLINICAL-USE; TECHNOLOGY; TELEHEALTH; SKYPE;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009388
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Remote video consultations between clinician and patient are technically possible and increasingly acceptable. They are being introduced in some settings alongside (and occasionally replacing) face-to-face or telephone consultations. Methods: To explore the advantages and limitations of video consultations, we will conduct in-depth qualitative studies of real consultations (microlevel) embedded in an organisational case study (mesolevel), taking account of national context (macrolevel). The study is based in 2 contrasting clinical settings (diabetes and cancer) in a National Health Service (NHS) acute trust in London, UK. Main data sources are: microlevel-audio, video and screen capture to produce rich multimodal data on 45 remote consultations; mesolevel-interviews, ethnographic observations and analysis of documents within the trust; macrolevel-key informant interviews of national-level stakeholders and document analysis. Data will be analysed and synthesised using a sociotechnical framework developed from structuration theory. Ethics approval: City Road and Hampstead NHS Research Ethics Committee, 9 December 2014, reference 14/LO/1883. Planned outputs: We plan outputs for 5 main audiences: (1) academics: research publications and conference presentations; (2) service providers: standard operating procedures, provisional operational guidance and key safety issues; (3) professional bodies and defence societies: summary of relevant findings to inform guidance to members; (4) policymakers: summary of key findings; (5) patients and carers: 'what to expect in your virtual consultation'. Discussion: The research literature on video consultations is sparse. Such consultations offer potential advantages to patients (who are spared the cost and inconvenience of travel) and the healthcare system (eg, they may be more cost-effective), but fears have been expressed that they may be clinically risky and/or less acceptable to patients or staff, and they bring significant technical, logistical and regulatory challenges. We anticipate that this study will contribute to a balanced assessment of when, how and in what circumstances this model might be introduced.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 97 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], BMJ
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2005, Structuration theory
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2006, Words Matter in Policy and Planning: Discourse Theory and Method in the Social Sciences, DOI DOI 10.1063/1.3033202
  • [4] [Anonymous], MAK US VIS AUD REC P
  • [5] Anthony Giddens, 1984, The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF01173303
  • [6] The clinical use of Skype-For which patients, with which problems and in which settings? A snapshot review of the literature
    Armfield, Nigel R.
    Bradford, Madeleine
    Bradford, Natalie K.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2015, 84 (10) : 737 - 742
  • [7] Clinical use of Skype: a review of the evidence base
    Armfield, Nigel R.
    Gray, Leonard C.
    Smith, Anthony C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TELEMEDICINE AND TELECARE, 2012, 18 (03) : 125 - 127
  • [8] Experiences of using email for general practice consultations: a qualitative study
    Atherton, Helen
    Pappas, Yannis
    Heneghan, Carl
    Murray, Elizabeth
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2013, 63 (616) : E760 - E767
  • [9] Atkinson J.M., 1984, Transcript Notation. Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis
  • [10] First steps in qualitative data analysis: transcribing
    Bailey, Julia
    [J]. FAMILY PRACTICE, 2008, 25 (02) : 127 - 131