Restrictive versus liberal strategy for red blood-cell transfusion in hip fracture patients A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:28
|
作者
Zhu, Chao [1 ]
Yin, Jian [1 ]
Wang, Bin [1 ]
Xue, Qingmei [1 ]
Gao, Shan [1 ]
Xing, Linyu [2 ]
Wang, Hua [1 ]
Liu, Wei [1 ]
Liu, Xinhui [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Med Univ, Affiliated Jiangning Hosp, Dept Orthoped, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Med Univ, Affiliated Jiangning Hosp, Dept Radiol, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
blood transfusion; hip fracture; liberal transfusion; restrictive transfusion; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; ELDERLY-PATIENTS; OLDER-ADULTS; RISK; THRESHOLDS; MORTALITY; OUTCOMES; DISEASE; SURGERY; STROKE;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000016795
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Most clinical guidelines recommend a restrictive red-blood-cell (RBC) transfusion threshold. However, indications for transfusion in patients with a hip fracture have not been definitively evaluated or remain controversial. We compared the pros and cons of restrictive versus liberal transfusion strategies in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. Methods: Electronic databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective cohort studies (RCSs) to investigate the effects of a restrictive strategy versus its liberal counterpart in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. The main clinical outcomes included delirium, mortality, infections, cardiogenic complications, thromboembolic events, cerebrovascular accidents, and length of hospital stay. The meta-analysis program of the Cochrane Collaboration (RevMan version 5.3.0) was used for data analysis. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed by both Cochran chi-squared test (Q test) and I-2 test. Both Begg and Egger tests were used to assess potential publication bias. Results: We identified 7 eligible RCTs and 2 eligible RCSs, involving 3,575 patients in total. In patients undergoing hip fracture surgery, we found no differences in frequency of delirium, mortality, the incidence rates of all infections, pneumonia, wound infection, all cardiovascular events, congestive heart failure, thromboembolic events or length of hospital stay between restrictive and liberal thresholds for RBC transfusion (P >.05). However, we found that the use of restrictive transfusion thresholds is associated with higher rates of acute coronary syndrome (P <.05) while liberal transfusion thresholds increase the risk of cerebrovascular accidents (P <.05). Conclusion: In patients undergoing hip fracture surgery, clinicians should evaluate the patient s condition in detail and adopt different transfusion strategies according to the patient s specific situation rather than merely using a certain transfusion strategy.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Red blood cell transfusion in neurocritical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yun Yu
    Yuxuan Fu
    Wenying Li
    Tiantian Sun
    Chan Cheng
    Yingzi Chong
    Ruquan Han
    Weihua Cui
    BMC Anesthesiology, 24
  • [22] Red blood cell transfusion in neurocritical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yu, Yun
    Fu, Yuxuan
    Li, Wenying
    Sun, Tiantian
    Cheng, Chan
    Chong, Yingzi
    Han, Ruquan
    Cui, Weihua
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [23] Restrictive versus Liberal Blood Transfusion Strategy in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
    Abdelazeem, Basel
    Malik, Bilal
    Kandah, Emad
    Banour, Sandi
    Rafae, Abdul
    Kunadi, Arvind
    Hassan, Mustafa
    JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY HOSPITAL INTERNAL MEDICINE PERSPECTIVES, 2022, 12 (03): : 40 - 47
  • [24] Blood transfusion and outcome after hip fracture: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Doleman, B.
    Potter, L.
    Moppett, I.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2014, 112 (01) : 190P - 191P
  • [25] Meta-analysis of restrictive versus liberal blood transfusion among patients with coronary artery disease
    Babikir Kheiri
    Moinuddin Syed
    Sameer Raina
    Mohammed Osman
    Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, 2021, 52 : 1081 - 1083
  • [26] Meta-analysis of restrictive versus liberal blood transfusion among patients with coronary artery disease
    Kheiri, Babikir
    Syed, Moinuddin
    Raina, Sameer
    Osman, Mohammed
    JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND THROMBOLYSIS, 2021, 52 (04) : 1081 - 1083
  • [27] Transfusion Strategy Liberal versus restrictive Blood Transfusion Strategy Comments
    Mueller, Markus M.
    Seifried, H. C. Erhard
    TRANSFUSIONSMEDIZIN, 2015, 5 (03) : 119 - 119
  • [28] RESTRICTIVE VERSUS LIBERAL TRANSFUSION STRATEGIES IN CARDIAC SURGERY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS WITH TRIAL SEQUENTIAL ANALYSIS
    Kashani, Hessam
    Lodewyks, Carly
    Kavosh, Morvarid S.
    Neilson, Christine
    Rabbani, Rasheda
    Abou-Setta, Ahmed
    Grocott, Hilary P.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2019, 128 : 104 - 107
  • [29] RESRTRICTIVE VERSUS LIBERAL BLOOD TRANSFUSION IN GASTROINTESTINAL BLEEDING: A META-ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Sayeh, Wasef
    Beran, Azizullah
    Farrow, David
    Dhoop, Sudheer M.
    Chinnam, Sahithi
    Musallam, Rami
    Ghazaleh, Sami
    Ramadugu, Ajit
    Nawras, Ali
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2023, 164 (06) : S833 - S833
  • [30] Restrictive Red Blood Cell Transfusion Strategies In Patients With Cardiovascular Disease: A Meta-Analysis
    Puch, I. Cortes
    Wiley, B. M.
    Klein, H. G.
    Welsh, J.
    Danner, R. L.
    Sun, J.
    Eichacker, P.
    Natanson, C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2017, 195