THE AESTHETICS OF DISABILITY

被引:0
作者
Harris, Jasmine E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] UC Davis Sch Law, Law, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] UC Davis Sch Law, Davis, CA 95616 USA
关键词
PHYSICAL ATTRACTIVENESS; ATTITUDES; LAW; PEOPLE; EMOTION; DISCRIMINATION; DESEGREGATION; INTEGRATION; AMERICANS; CONTACT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
The foundational faith of disability law is the proposition that we can reduce disability discrimination if we can foster interactions between disabled and nondisabled people. This central faith, which is rooted in contact theory, has encouraged integration of people with and without disabilities, with the expectation that contact will reduce prejudicial attitudes and shift societal norms. However, neither the scholarship nor disability law sufficiently accounts for what this Article calls the "aesthetics of disability," the proposition that our interaction with disability is mediated by an affective process that inclines us to like, dislike, be attracted to, or be repulsed by others on the basis of their appearance. The aesthetics literature introduces a significant complication to uncritical reliance on contact as the theoretical and remedial basis for our inclusive ideal. Contact and engagement with the aesthetics of disability may fail to provide the benefits assumed by contact theory, but more perversely, under certain conditions, they may trigger negative affective responses that may stunt the very normative change sought through antidiscrimination law. This Article proposes a novel theoretical lens to more accurately reflect the complexity of the aesthetic-affective process of discriminatory behavior in the context of disability.
引用
收藏
页码:895 / 971
页数:77
相关论文
共 260 条
[1]   A rage shared by law: Post-september 11 racial violence as crimes of passion [J].
Ahmad, MI .
CALIFORNIA LAW REVIEW, 2004, 92 (05) :1259-1330
[2]  
Ahmad Muneer I., 2004, CALIF LAW REV, V92, P1303
[3]  
Ahmed S, 2014, CULTURAL POLITICS OF EMOTION, 2ND EDITION, P1
[4]  
Ahmed Sara., 2010, The Affect Theory Reader, P29, DOI DOI 10.1215/9780822393047-001
[5]  
Aiden Hardeep, 2014, SCOPE CURRENT ATTITU, V3
[6]  
Alexander Michelle, 2012, NEW JIM CROW MASS IN, P36
[7]  
Allport Gordon W., 1979, NAT PREJUDICE, V109, P132
[8]  
Altieri E., 2003, Image, inquiry, and transformative practice: Engaging learners in creative and critical inquiry through visual representation, P109
[9]  
Altieri Elizabeth, 2003, COUNTERPOINTS, V203, P111
[10]  
Alvaro Francisco, 2016, WASH POST