Psychometric Properties of the Slovak and Czech Versions of the Evidence-Based Practice Beliefs and Implementation Scales

被引:10
作者
Zelenikova, Renata [1 ]
Gurkova, Elena [2 ]
Ziakova, Katarina [3 ]
Tomagova, Martina [3 ]
Jarosova, Darja [1 ]
Fineout-Overholt, Ellen [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ostrava, Fac Med, Dept Nursing & Midwifery, Syllabova 19, Ostrava 70300, Czech Republic
[2] Univ Presov, Fac Hlth Care, Dept Nursing, Presov, Slovakia
[3] Comenius Univ, Jessenius Fac Med Martin, Dept Nursing, Bratislava, Slovakia
[4] Univ Texas Tyler, Coll Nursing & Hlth Sci, Nursing, Tyler, TX USA
关键词
evidence-based practice; implementation; belief; EBP course; nursing student; NURSES; INSTRUMENTS; KNOWLEDGE; SKILLS;
D O I
10.1111/wvn.12128
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe Evidence-Based Practice Beliefs (EBP-B) and Evidence-Based Practice Implementation (EBP-I) scales are psychometrically sound instruments that were used, within an educational setting, to systematically study students' beliefs about and their implementation of evidence-based practice (EBP).Czech and Slovak versions of these instruments were developed and evaluated using a sample population of nursing students. PurposeThe purpose of the study was to test the psychometric properties of the Czech and Slovak versions of the EBP-B and EBP-I scales. MethodsPsychometric properties were evaluated using a sample of undergraduate and graduate (nearly graduated) nursing students (n = 223) completing EBP courses. To test psychometric properties of the questionnaire, its reliability and validity were explored. Cronbachs alpha was computed to evaluate internal structure and internal consistency. ResultsThe Slovak versions of both the EBP-B and the EBP-I scale have good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha: .82 and .94, respectively). Similarly, the Czech versions of the EBP-B and the EBP-I scales both have good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha: .85 and .89, respectively). Linking Evidence to ActionThe results of psychometric analysis of the Czech and Slovak versions of the EBP-B and the EBP-I scales are consistent with the results of the original study and indicate that the Czech and Slovak versions have the potential to be valid, reliable, and sensitive instruments for measuring an individual's beliefs about the value of EBP and their ability to implement it. Both instruments can be used to assess changes in nurses ' beliefs about EBP over time as well as the effectiveness of strategies aimed at promoting the use of evidence in practice.
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 152
页数:14
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Factors associated with evidence-based practice among registered nurses in Sweden: a national cross-sectional study
    Bostrom, Anne-Marie
    Rudman, Ann
    Ehrenberg, Anna
    Gustavsson, Jens Petter
    Wallin, Lars
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2013, 13
  • [2] Cohen J, 2013, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, DOI [10.4324/9780203771587, DOI 10.4324/9780203771587]
  • [3] What is the evidence that postgraduate teaching in evidence based medicine changes anything? A systematic review
    Coomarasamy, A
    Khan, KS
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 329 (7473): : 1017 - 1019
  • [4] Fineout-Overholt E., 2011, Evidence-based Practice in Nursing & Healthcare: A Guide to Best Practice, P291
  • [5] Factors influencing the development of evidence-based practice: a research tool
    Gerrish, Kate
    Ashworth, Peter
    Lacey, Anne
    Bailey, Jeff
    Cooke, Jo
    Kendall, Sally
    McNeilly, Elaine
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2007, 57 (03) : 328 - 338
  • [6] Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic, 2014, HLTH CAR WORK 31 12
  • [7] Institute of National Health Information, 2015, HLTH STAT YB SLOV RE
  • [8] Jaroova D., 2014, CENTRAL EUROPEAN J N, V5, P169, DOI 10.15452/CEJNM.2014.05.0013
  • [9] Introduction to health measurement scales
    Keszei, Andras P.
    Novak, Marta
    Streiner, David L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 2010, 68 (04) : 319 - 323
  • [10] Systematic review of instruments for measuring nurses' knowledge, skills and attitudes for evidence-based practice
    Leung, Kat
    Trevena, Lyndal
    Waters, Donna
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2014, 70 (10) : 2181 - 2195