Understanding how and why de-implementation works in health and care: research protocol for a realist synthesis of evidence

被引:15
|
作者
Burton, Christopher [1 ]
Williams, Lynne [2 ]
Bucknall, Tracey [3 ]
Edwards, Stephen [2 ]
Fisher, Denise [2 ]
Hall, Beth [2 ]
Harris, Gill [4 ]
Jones, Peter [2 ]
Makin, Matthew [5 ]
McBride, Anne [6 ]
Meacock, Rachel [7 ]
Parkinson, John [2 ]
Rycroft-Malone, Jo [2 ]
Waring, Justin [8 ]
机构
[1] Bangor Univ, Sch Hlth Sci, Noreen Edwards Chair Rehabil & Nursing Res, Bangor, Gwynedd, Wales
[2] Bangor Univ, Bangor, Gwynedd, Wales
[3] Deakin Univ, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Betsi Cadwaladr Univ Hlth Board, Bangor, Gwynedd, Wales
[5] Pennine Acute Hosp NHS Trust, Manchester, England
[6] Univ Manchester, Alliance Manchester Business Sch, Manchester, Lancs, England
[7] Univ Manchester, Hlth Serv Res & Primary Care, Div Populat Hlth, Manchester, Lancs, England
[8] Univ Nottingham, Business Sch, Nottingham, England
关键词
De-implementation; Low-value practice; Overuse; Health services; Concept analysis; Realist synthesis;
D O I
10.1186/s13643-019-1111-8
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Strategies to improve the effectiveness and quality of health and care have predominantly emphasised the implementation of new research and evidence into service organisation and delivery. A parallel, but less understood issue is how clinicians and service leaders stop existing practices and interventions that are no longer evidence based, where new evidence supersedes old evidence, or interventions are replaced with those that are more cost effective. The aim of this evidence synthesis is to produce meaningful programme theory and practical guidance for policy makers, managers and clinicians to understand how and why de-implementation processes and procedures can work. Methods and analysis The synthesis will examine the attributes or characteristics that constitute the concept of de-implementation. The research team will then draw on the principles of realist inquiry to provide an explanatory account of how, in what context and for whom to explain the successful processes and impacts of de-implementation. The review will be conducted in four phases over 18 months. Phase 1: develop a framework to map the preliminary programme theories through an initial scoping of the literature and consultation with key stakeholders. Phase 2: systematic searches of the evidence to develop the theories identified in phase 1. Phase 3: validation and refinement of programme theories through stakeholder interviews. Phase 4: formulating actionable recommendations for managers, commissioners and service leaders about what works through different approaches to de-implementation. Discussion This evidence synthesis will address gaps in knowledge about de-implementation across health and care services and ensure that guidance about strategies and approaches accounts for contextual factors, which may be operating at different organisational and decision-making levels. Through the development of the programme theory, which explains what works, how and under which circumstances, findings from the evidence synthesis will support managers and service leaders to make measured decisions about de-implementation.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [31] Evidence synthesis of health policy and systems research in rehabilitation: a protocol for Cochrane overviews of systematic reviews on delivery, governance, financial arrangements, and implementation strategies
    Negrini, Stefano
    Kiekens, Carlotte
    DEL Furia, Matteo J.
    Minozzi, Silvia
    Ryan, Rebecca
    Arienti, Chiara
    Parkhill, Anne
    Cote, Pierre
    Gimigliano, Francesca
    Sabariego, Carla
    Capodaglio, Paolo
    Decary, Simon
    DE Groote, Wouter
    Frontera, Walter R.
    Mudau, Qhayiya
    Atkinson-graham, Melissa
    Bakaa, Noora
    Battel, Irene
    Butzbach, Olivier K.
    Cordani, Claudio
    Engeda, Eshetu H.
    Konstantinidis, Theodore
    Iolascon, Giovanni
    Liguori, Sara
    Mior, Silvano
    Moretti, Antimo
    Paoletta, Marco
    Touhami, Dima
    Wong, Jessica
    Duttine, Antony
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2025,
  • [32] How can interprofessional collaboration be fostered and sustained in team-based care integration for older people in community settings? A realist evidence synthesis
    Deirdre O’Donnell
    Carmel Davies
    Catherine Devaney
    Apolonia Radomska
    Marie O’Shea
    Gráinne O’Donoghue
    Aoife De Brún
    Sarah Donnelly
    Helen Whitty
    PJ Harnett
    Deirdre Lang
    Emer Ahern
    Sahar Hammoud
    Éidín Ní Shé
    Systematic Reviews, 14 (1)
  • [33] Engaging family caregivers and health system partners in exploring how multi-level contexts in primary care practices affect case management functions and outcomes of patients and family caregivers at end of life: a realist synthesis
    Grace Warner
    Lisa Garland Baird
    Brendan McCormack
    Robin Urquhart
    Beverley Lawson
    Cheryl Tschupruk
    Erin Christian
    Lori Weeks
    Kothai Kumanan
    Tara Sampalli
    BMC Palliative Care, 20
  • [34] Engaging family caregivers and health system partners in exploring how multi-level contexts in primary care practices affect case management functions and outcomes of patients and family caregivers at end of life: a realist synthesis
    Warner, Grace
    Baird, Lisa Garland
    McCormack, Brendan
    Urquhart, Robin
    Lawson, Beverley
    Tschupruk, Cheryl
    Christian, Erin
    Weeks, Lori
    Kumanan, Kothai
    Sampalli, Tara
    BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 2021, 20 (01)