Understanding how and why de-implementation works in health and care: research protocol for a realist synthesis of evidence

被引:15
|
作者
Burton, Christopher [1 ]
Williams, Lynne [2 ]
Bucknall, Tracey [3 ]
Edwards, Stephen [2 ]
Fisher, Denise [2 ]
Hall, Beth [2 ]
Harris, Gill [4 ]
Jones, Peter [2 ]
Makin, Matthew [5 ]
McBride, Anne [6 ]
Meacock, Rachel [7 ]
Parkinson, John [2 ]
Rycroft-Malone, Jo [2 ]
Waring, Justin [8 ]
机构
[1] Bangor Univ, Sch Hlth Sci, Noreen Edwards Chair Rehabil & Nursing Res, Bangor, Gwynedd, Wales
[2] Bangor Univ, Bangor, Gwynedd, Wales
[3] Deakin Univ, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Betsi Cadwaladr Univ Hlth Board, Bangor, Gwynedd, Wales
[5] Pennine Acute Hosp NHS Trust, Manchester, England
[6] Univ Manchester, Alliance Manchester Business Sch, Manchester, Lancs, England
[7] Univ Manchester, Hlth Serv Res & Primary Care, Div Populat Hlth, Manchester, Lancs, England
[8] Univ Nottingham, Business Sch, Nottingham, England
关键词
De-implementation; Low-value practice; Overuse; Health services; Concept analysis; Realist synthesis;
D O I
10.1186/s13643-019-1111-8
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Strategies to improve the effectiveness and quality of health and care have predominantly emphasised the implementation of new research and evidence into service organisation and delivery. A parallel, but less understood issue is how clinicians and service leaders stop existing practices and interventions that are no longer evidence based, where new evidence supersedes old evidence, or interventions are replaced with those that are more cost effective. The aim of this evidence synthesis is to produce meaningful programme theory and practical guidance for policy makers, managers and clinicians to understand how and why de-implementation processes and procedures can work. Methods and analysis The synthesis will examine the attributes or characteristics that constitute the concept of de-implementation. The research team will then draw on the principles of realist inquiry to provide an explanatory account of how, in what context and for whom to explain the successful processes and impacts of de-implementation. The review will be conducted in four phases over 18 months. Phase 1: develop a framework to map the preliminary programme theories through an initial scoping of the literature and consultation with key stakeholders. Phase 2: systematic searches of the evidence to develop the theories identified in phase 1. Phase 3: validation and refinement of programme theories through stakeholder interviews. Phase 4: formulating actionable recommendations for managers, commissioners and service leaders about what works through different approaches to de-implementation. Discussion This evidence synthesis will address gaps in knowledge about de-implementation across health and care services and ensure that guidance about strategies and approaches accounts for contextual factors, which may be operating at different organisational and decision-making levels. Through the development of the programme theory, which explains what works, how and under which circumstances, findings from the evidence synthesis will support managers and service leaders to make measured decisions about de-implementation.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Understanding how and why de-implementation works in health and care: research protocol for a realist synthesis of evidence
    Christopher Burton
    Lynne Williams
    Tracey Bucknall
    Stephen Edwards
    Denise Fisher
    Beth Hall
    Gill Harris
    Peter Jones
    Matthew Makin
    Anne McBride
    Rachel Meacock
    John Parkinson
    Jo Rycroft-Malone
    Justin Waring
    Systematic Reviews, 8
  • [2] PROMOTING HEALTH EQUITY THROUGH DE-IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH
    Helfrich, Christian D.
    Hartmann, Christine W.
    Parikh, Toral J.
    Au, David H.
    ETHNICITY & DISEASE, 2019, 29 : 93 - 96
  • [3] Studying de-implementation in health: an analysis of funded research grants
    Wynne E. Norton
    Amy E. Kennedy
    David A. Chambers
    Implementation Science, 12
  • [4] Studying de-implementation in health: an analysis of funded research grants
    Norton, Wynne E.
    Kennedy, Amy E.
    Chambers, David A.
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2017, 12
  • [5] Low-value health care, de-implementation, and implications for nursing research: A discussion paper
    Beks, H.
    Clayden, S.
    Wong Shee, Anna
    Manias, E.
    Versace, V. L.
    Beauchamp, A.
    Mc Namara, K. P.
    Alston, L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2024, 156
  • [6] A Health Systems Ethical Framework for De-Implementation in Health Care
    Baskin, Alison S.
    Wang, Ton
    Miller, Jacquelyn
    Jagsi, Reshma
    Kerr, Eve A.
    Dossett, Lesly A.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2021, 267 : 151 - 158
  • [7] Determinants for the use and de-implementation of low-value care in health care: a scoping review
    Augustsson, Hanna
    Ingvarsson, Sara
    Nilsen, Per
    von Thiele Schwarz, Ulrica
    Muli, Irene
    Dervish, Jessica
    Hasson, Henna
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE COMMUNICATIONS, 2021, 2 (01):
  • [8] How does culture fit into de-implementation? A scoping review of empirical research
    Clinkscales, Andryce
    Barrett, Courtenay A.
    Endres, Bryn
    PSYCHOLOGY IN THE SCHOOLS, 2024, 61 (09) : 3589 - 3611
  • [9] De-Implementation of Evidence-Based Interventions: Implications for Organizational and Managerial Research
    Pinto, Rogerio M.
    Park, Sunggeun
    HUMAN SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS MANAGEMENT LEADERSHIP & GOVERNANCE, 2019, 43 (04) : 336 - 343
  • [10] Supporting successful implementation of public health interventions: Protocol for a realist synthesis
    MacDonald M.
    Pauly B.
    Wong G.
    Schick-Makaroff K.
    van Roode T.
    Strosher H.W.
    Kothari A.
    Valaitis R.
    Manson H.
    O'Briain W.
    Carroll S.
    Lee V.
    Tong S.
    Smith K.D.
    Ward M.
    Systematic Reviews, 5 (1)