Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Predictor of Clinical Outcome in Canine Spontaneous Soft Tissue Sarcomas Treated with Thermoradiotherapy

被引:31
|
作者
Viglianti, Benjamin L. [1 ]
Lora-Michiels, Michael [1 ]
Poulson, Jeanie M. [1 ]
Lan, Lan [2 ]
Yu, Dahio [5 ]
Sanders, Linda [2 ]
Craciunescu, Oana [1 ]
Vujaskovic, Zeljko [1 ]
Thrall, Donald E. [4 ]
Macfall, James [3 ]
Charles, Cecil H. [3 ]
Wong, Terence [3 ]
Dewhirst, Mark W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Biostat & Bioinformat, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[3] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[4] N Carolina State Univ, Sch Vet Med, Raleigh, NC 27606 USA
[5] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Dept Biostat, Tampa, FL USA
关键词
RADIATION-THERAPY; CERVICAL-CARCINOMA; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; PLUS HYPERTHERMIA; TUMOR OXYGENATION; BLOOD-FLOW; RADIOTHERAPY; PERFUSION; CANCER; MRI;
D O I
10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-2222
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: This study tests whether dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) parameters obtained from canine patients with soft tissue sarcomas, treated with hyperthermia and radiotherapy, are predictive of therapeutic outcome. Experimental Design: Thirty-seven dogs with soft tissue sarcomas had DCE-MRI done before and following the first hyperthermia. Signal enhancement for tumor and reference muscle were fitted empirically, yielding a washin/washout rate for the contrast agent and tumor area under the signal enhancement curve (AUC) calculated from 0 to 60 seconds, 90 seconds, and the time of maximal enhancement in the reference muscle. These parameters were then compared with local tumor control, metastasis-free survival, and overall survival. Results: Pretherapy rate of contrast agent washout was positively predictive of improved overall and metastasis-free survival with hazard ratio of 0.67 (P = 0.015) and 0.68 (P = 0.012), respectively. After the first hyperthermia washin rate, AUC60, AUC90, and AUCt-max were predictive of improved overall and metastasis-free survival with hazard ratio ranging from 0.46 to 0.53 (P < 0.002) and 0.44 to 0.55 (P < 0.004), respectively. DCE-MRI parameters were compared with extracellular pH and P-31 MR spectroscopy results (previously published) in the same patients showing a correlation. This suggested that an increase in perfusion after therapy was effective in eliminating excess acid from the tumor. Conclusions: This study shows that DCE-MRI has utility predicting overall and metastasis-free survival in canine patients with soft tissue sarcomas. To our knowledge, this is the first time that DCE-MRI parameters are predictive of clinical outcome for soft tissue sarcomas.
引用
收藏
页码:4993 / 5001
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Imaging vascular function for early stage clinical trials using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
    M. O. Leach
    B. Morgan
    P. S. Tofts
    D. L. Buckley
    W. Huang
    M. A. Horsfield
    T. L. Chenevert
    D. J. Collins
    A. Jackson
    D. Lomas
    B. Whitcher
    L. Clarke
    R. Plummer
    I. Judson
    R. Jones
    R. Alonzi
    T. Brunner
    D. M. Koh
    P. Murphy
    J. C. Waterton
    G. Parker
    M. J. Graves
    T. W. J. Scheenen
    T. W. Redpath
    M. Orton
    G. Karczmar
    H. Huisman
    J. Barentsz
    A. Padhani
    European Radiology, 2012, 22 : 1451 - 1464
  • [32] BRAIN TUMORS A Multimodality Approach with Diffusion-Weighted Imaging, Diffusion Tensor Imaging, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Brandao, Lara A.
    Shiroishi, Mark S.
    Law, Meng
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2013, 21 (02) : 199 - +
  • [33] Advances in Contrast Agents for Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Khairnar, Snehal
    More, Namdev
    Mounika, Choppadandi
    Kapusetti, Govinda
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION SCIENCES, 2019, 50 (04) : 575 - 589
  • [34] SEMIQUANTITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE DYNAMIC CONTRAST-ENHANCED MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING MEASUREMENTS PREDICT RADIATION RESPONSE IN CERVIX CANCER
    Zahra, Mark A.
    Tan, Li Tee
    Priest, Andrew N.
    Graves, Martin J.
    Arends, Mark
    Crawford, Robin A. F.
    Brenton, James D.
    Lomas, David J.
    Sala, Evis
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2009, 74 (03): : 766 - 773
  • [35] Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in denervated skeletal muscle: Experimental study in rabbits
    Qi, Liang
    Xu, Lei
    Wang, Wen-Tao
    Zhang, Yu-Dong
    Zhang, Rui
    Zou, Yue-Fen
    Shi, Hai-Bin
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (04):
  • [36] Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Breast Tumors at 3 and 7 T A Comparison
    Gruber, Stephan
    Pinker, Katja
    Zaric, Olgica
    Minarikova, Lenka
    Chmelik, Marek
    Baltzer, Pascal
    Boubela, Roland N.
    Helbich, Thomas
    Bogner, Wolfgang
    Trattnig, Siegfried
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2014, 49 (05) : 354 - 362
  • [37] Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and pharmacokinetic models in prostate cancer
    Tobias Franiel
    Bernd Hamm
    Hedvig Hricak
    European Radiology, 2011, 21 : 616 - 626
  • [38] Reliability and responsiveness of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in rheumatoid arthritis
    Axelsen, M. B.
    Poggenborg, R. P.
    Stoltenberg, M.
    Kubassova, O.
    Boesen, M.
    Horslev-Petersen, K.
    Bliddal, H.
    Hanson, L. G.
    Ostergaard, M.
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2013, 42 (02) : 115 - 122
  • [39] Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Pharmacodynamic Biomarker for Pazopanib in Metastatic Renal Carcinoma
    Sweis, Randy F.
    Medved, Milica
    Towey, Shannon
    Karczmar, Gregory S.
    Oto, Aytekin
    Szmulewitz, Russell Z.
    O'Donnell, Peter H.
    Fishkin, Paul
    Karrison, Theodore
    Stadler, Walter M.
    CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER, 2017, 15 (02) : 207 - 212
  • [40] Sensitive physiologic imaging with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
    Litt, L
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1998, 88 (04) : 847 - 850