Decision-making in HIV clinical trials: a study with patients enrolled in antiretroviral trials

被引:1
|
作者
Feijoo-Cid, Maria [1 ,2 ]
Rivero-Santana, Amado [3 ,4 ]
Morina, David [5 ,6 ]
Cesar, Carina [7 ]
Fink, Valeria [7 ]
Sued, Omar [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Fac Med, Dept Nursing, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Grp Recerca Multidisciplinar Salut & Soc GREMSAS, Barcelona, Spain
[3] Fdn Canaria Inst Invest Sanitaria Canarias FIISC, Las Palmas Gran Canaria, Spain
[4] Red Invest Serv Salud Enfermedades Cron REDISSEC, Madrid, Spain
[5] Barcelona Grad Sch Math, Barcelona, Spain
[6] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Dept Matemat, Barcelona, Spain
[7] Fdn Huesped, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
关键词
Clinical trial; Human immunodeficiency virus; Patient participation; Decisional conflict; INFORMED-CONSENT; PARTICIPATION; VALIDATION; KNOWLEDGE; CONFLICT; BARRIERS; REGRET;
D O I
10.1016/j.gaceta.2019.11.008
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To explore the decisional process of people living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) currently enrolled in antiretroviral clinical trials. Method: Cross-sectional retrospective study. Outcome variables were reasons to participate, perceived decisional role (Control Preference Scale), the Decisional Conflict Scale and the Decisional Regret Scale. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and associations among these variables and with sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were analyzed with non-parametric techniques. Results: Main reasons to participate were gratitude towards Fundaci?n Huesped (47%), the doctor?s recommendation (32%), and perceived difficulty to access treatment in a public hospital (28%). Most patients thought that they made their decision alone (54.8%) or collaboratively with the physician (43%). Decisional conflict was low, with only some conflict in the support subscale (median = 16.67). Education was the only significant correlate of the total decisional conflict score (higher in less educated patients; p = 0.018), whereas education, recent diagnosis, living alone, lower age, being man and doctor?s recommendation to go to Fundaci?n Hu?sped related to higher conflict in different subscales. Nobody regretted to participate. Conclusions: The decision making regarding participation in HIV trials, from the perspective of participants, was made respecting their autonomy and with very low decisional conflict. Currently, patients show no signs of regret. However, even in this favorable context, results highlight the necessity of enhancing the decision support in more vulnerable patients (e.g., less educated, recently diagnosed or with less social support), thus warranting equity in the quality of the decision making process. ? 2020 SESPAS. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:264 / 269
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Testing decision-making competency of schizophrenia participants in clinical trials. A meta-analysis and meta-regression
    Sorin Hostiuc
    Mugurel Constantin Rusu
    Ionut Negoi
    Eduard Drima
    BMC Psychiatry, 18
  • [42] The factors affecting implementing shared decision-making in clinical trials: a cross-sectional survey of clinical research coordinators’ perceptions in Japan
    Miho Fujita
    Yuki Yonekura
    Kazuhiro Nakayama
    BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 23
  • [43] "It All Depends": Patient and Decision Partner Experiences in Cancer Clinical Trial Decision-Making
    Gray, Tamryn F.
    Allgood, Sarah J.
    Nolan, Marie T.
    Gallo, Joseph J.
    Han, Hae-Ra
    Clayman, Marla L.
    Budhathoki, Chakra
    Lansey, Dina G.
    Wenzel, Jennifer
    QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2022, 32 (06) : 887 - 901
  • [44] Optimization of the decision-making process for the selection of therapeutics to undergo clinical testing for spinal cord injury in the North American Clinical Trials Network
    Guest, James
    Harrop, James S.
    Aarabi, Bizhan
    Grossman, Robert G.
    Fawcett, James W.
    Fehlings, Michael G.
    Tator, Charles H.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2012, 17 : 94 - 101
  • [45] Testing decision-making competency of schizophrenia participants in clinical trials. A meta-analysis and meta-regression
    Hostiuc, Sorin
    Rusu, Mugurel Constantin
    Negoi, Ionut
    Drima, Eduard
    BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 18 : 2
  • [46] Depression and anxiety in cancer patient enrolled in clinical trials with serious adverse events
    Peng, Zhen
    Wang, Chongwei
    Sun, Yubei
    Ma, Yan
    Wang, Jumei
    Xu, Fei
    Xu, Xiaoling
    Chen, Yin
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (19): : 20015 - 20026
  • [47] Promoting Accrual of Older Patients with Cancer to Clinical Trials: An Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology Member Survey (A171602)
    Freedman, Rachel A.
    Dockter, Travis J.
    Lafky, Jacqueline M.
    Hurria, Arti
    Muss, Hyman J.
    Cohen, Harvey J.
    Jatoi, Aminah
    Kemeny, M. Margaret
    Ruddy, Kathryn J.
    ONCOLOGIST, 2018, 23 (09) : 1016 - 1023
  • [48] Recognizing the Financial Burden of Cancer Patients in Clinical Trials
    Nipp, Ryan D.
    Powell, Elizabeth
    Chabner, Bruce
    Moy, Beverly
    ONCOLOGIST, 2015, 20 (06) : 572 - 575
  • [49] People living with HIV: Sources of information on antiretroviral treatment and preferences for involvement in treatment decision-making
    Kremer, Heidemarie
    Ironson, Gail
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2007, 12 (01) : 34 - 42
  • [50] Reporting quality of randomized controlled trials in patients with HIV on antiretroviral therapy: a systematic review
    Nagai, Kaori
    Saito, Akiko M.
    Saito, Toshiki I.
    Kaneko, Noriyo
    TRIALS, 2017, 18