Decision-making in HIV clinical trials: a study with patients enrolled in antiretroviral trials

被引:1
|
作者
Feijoo-Cid, Maria [1 ,2 ]
Rivero-Santana, Amado [3 ,4 ]
Morina, David [5 ,6 ]
Cesar, Carina [7 ]
Fink, Valeria [7 ]
Sued, Omar [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Fac Med, Dept Nursing, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Grp Recerca Multidisciplinar Salut & Soc GREMSAS, Barcelona, Spain
[3] Fdn Canaria Inst Invest Sanitaria Canarias FIISC, Las Palmas Gran Canaria, Spain
[4] Red Invest Serv Salud Enfermedades Cron REDISSEC, Madrid, Spain
[5] Barcelona Grad Sch Math, Barcelona, Spain
[6] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Dept Matemat, Barcelona, Spain
[7] Fdn Huesped, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
关键词
Clinical trial; Human immunodeficiency virus; Patient participation; Decisional conflict; INFORMED-CONSENT; PARTICIPATION; VALIDATION; KNOWLEDGE; CONFLICT; BARRIERS; REGRET;
D O I
10.1016/j.gaceta.2019.11.008
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To explore the decisional process of people living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) currently enrolled in antiretroviral clinical trials. Method: Cross-sectional retrospective study. Outcome variables were reasons to participate, perceived decisional role (Control Preference Scale), the Decisional Conflict Scale and the Decisional Regret Scale. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and associations among these variables and with sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were analyzed with non-parametric techniques. Results: Main reasons to participate were gratitude towards Fundaci?n Huesped (47%), the doctor?s recommendation (32%), and perceived difficulty to access treatment in a public hospital (28%). Most patients thought that they made their decision alone (54.8%) or collaboratively with the physician (43%). Decisional conflict was low, with only some conflict in the support subscale (median = 16.67). Education was the only significant correlate of the total decisional conflict score (higher in less educated patients; p = 0.018), whereas education, recent diagnosis, living alone, lower age, being man and doctor?s recommendation to go to Fundaci?n Hu?sped related to higher conflict in different subscales. Nobody regretted to participate. Conclusions: The decision making regarding participation in HIV trials, from the perspective of participants, was made respecting their autonomy and with very low decisional conflict. Currently, patients show no signs of regret. However, even in this favorable context, results highlight the necessity of enhancing the decision support in more vulnerable patients (e.g., less educated, recently diagnosed or with less social support), thus warranting equity in the quality of the decision making process. ? 2020 SESPAS. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:264 / 269
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Experiences of a Multiethnic Cohort of Patients Enrolled in a Financial Reimbursement Program for Cancer Clinical Trials
    Medina, Sheyla P. P.
    Zhang, Sylvia Y.
    Nieves, Elena
    Dornsife, Dana L. L.
    Johnson, Robert
    Spicer, Darcy
    Borno, Hala T. T.
    JCO ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2023, 19 (05) : 310 - +
  • [22] The factors affecting implementing shared decision-making in clinical trials: a cross-sectional survey of clinical research coordinators' perceptions in Japan
    Fujita, Miho
    Yonekura, Yuki
    Nakayama, Kazuhiro
    BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [23] Parents' Experiences in Decision Making With Childhood Cancer Clinical Trials
    Woodgate, Roberta Lynn
    Yanofsky, Rochelle Avis
    CANCER NURSING, 2010, 33 (01) : 11 - 18
  • [24] How informed is declared altruism in clinical trials? A qualitative interview study of patient decision-making about the QUEST trials (Quality of Life after Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction)
    Natalie Bidad
    Lindsay MacDonald
    Zoë E. Winters
    Sarah J. L. Edwards
    Marie Emson
    Clare L. Griffin
    Judith Bliss
    Rob Horne
    Trials, 17
  • [25] Decision-Making Process Related to Participation in Phase I Clinical Trials: A Nonsystematic Review of the Existing Evidence
    Gorini, Alessandra
    Mazzocco, Ketti
    Pravettoni, Gabriella
    PUBLIC HEALTH GENOMICS, 2015, 18 (06) : 359 - 365
  • [26] Shared Decision-Making Applied to Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials
    Riddle, Daniel L.
    Sando, Trisha
    Tarver, Talicia
    Slover, James
    Sierra, Rafael J.
    Brito, Juan P.
    Montori, Victor M.
    ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2021, 73 (08) : 1125 - 1133
  • [27] Oncologic patients' misconceptions may impede enrollment into clinical trials: a cross-sectional study
    Asher, Nethanel
    Raphael, Ari
    Wolf, Ido
    Pelles, Sharon
    Geva, Ravit
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [28] Comprehension of Randomization and Uncertainty in Cancer Clinical Trials Decision Making Among Rural, Appalachian Patients
    Krieger, Janice L.
    Palmer-Wackerly, Angela
    Dailey, Phokeng M.
    Krok-Schoen, Jessica L.
    Schoenberg, Nancy E.
    Paskett, Electra D.
    JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION, 2015, 30 (04) : 743 - 748
  • [29] Decision-making and autonomy among participants in early-phase cancer immunotherapy trials: a qualitative study
    Avery, Jonathan
    Bell, Jennifer A. H.
    Baryolay, Khotira
    Rodin, Gary
    Nissim, Rinat
    Balneaves, Lynda G.
    BMC CANCER, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [30] Determinants of Participation in HIV Clinical Trials: The Importance of Patients' Trust in Their Provider
    Volkmann, Elizabeth R.
    Claiborne, Deon
    Currier, Judith S.
    HIV CLINICAL TRIALS, 2009, 10 (02): : 104 - 109