Pretreatment characteristics associated with orthodontic treatment duration

被引:81
作者
Fisher, Monica A. [1 ]
Wenger, Reid M.
Hans, Mark G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Case Western Reserve Univ, Sch Dent Med, Dept Orthodont, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
关键词
PREDICTORS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.09.028
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Introduction: Pretreatment characteristics can assist orthodontists in accurately estimating treatment duration. Methods: This case-control study identified 400 patients, 9 to 18 years of age. Short treatment duration was 20 months or less, and long treatment duration was 30 months or longer. Potential pretreatment explanatory variables included planned treatment, sociodemographic, behavior, dental, skeletal, and soft-tissue characteristics. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression modeling was used to quantify the association between patient characteristics and treatment duration by reporting the unadjusted odds ratios (OR-crude), the adjusted odds ratios (ORadj), and the 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Patients planned as nonextraction (ORadj = 2.3; 95% CI, 1.3-4.2), no deciduous teeth (ORadj = 3.0; 95% CI, 1.5-5.9), less than 80% overbite (ORadj = 2.4; 95% CI, 1.3-4.4), less than 6 mm of maxillary crowding (ORadj = 3.6; 95% CI, 1.7-7.7), and good oral hygiene (ORadj = 3.2; 95% CI, 1.3-1.8) were 2 to 3 times more likely to have short treatments. Patients with decreased lower facial height (ORadj = 3.4; 95% CI, 1.6-7.1), extractions (ORadj = 1.8; 95% CI, 1.0-3.2), deciduous teeth (ORadj = 1.9; 95% CI, 1.0-3.4), poor grades (ORadj = 2.0; 95% CI, 1.1-3.8), excessive overjet (ORadj = 2.3; 95% CI, 1.4-3.8), 80% or more overbite (ORadj = 2.0; 95% CI, 1.2-3.6), and 6 mm or more of maxillary crowding (ORadj = 2.6; 95% CI, 1.4-4.6) were 2 to 3 times more likely to have long treatments. Conclusions: Presence or absence of severe maxillary crowding, deciduous teeth, 80% overbite, and extractions were consistently, inversely, and independently associated with short and long treatment durations. (Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 137: 178-86)
引用
收藏
页码:178 / 186
页数:9
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, WILEY PS TX, DOI 10.1002/0471722146
[2]   An evaluation of factors affecting duration of orthodontic treatment [J].
Beckwith, FR ;
Ackerman, RJ ;
Cobb, CM ;
Tira, DE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1999, 115 (04) :439-447
[3]  
BURT BA, 1999, DENT DENT PRACTICE C, P160
[4]  
*CDCP, EP INF 6 VERS 6 04D
[5]   THE DURATION OF ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT [J].
FINK, DF ;
SMITH, RJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1992, 102 (01) :45-51
[6]  
Hennekens CH., 1987, EPIDEMIOLOGY MED, P287
[7]   Cephalometric variables as predictors of Class II treatment outcome [J].
Kim, JC ;
Mascarenhas, AK ;
Joo, BH ;
Vig, KWL ;
Beck, FM ;
Vig, PS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2000, 118 (06) :636-640
[8]  
Mascarenhas Ana Karina, 2002, J Dent Educ, V66, P94
[9]  
O'Connor P J, 2000, J Clin Orthod, V34, P591
[10]   Predictors for Class II treatment duration [J].
Popowich, K ;
Nebbe, B ;
Heo, G ;
Glover, KE ;
Major, PW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2005, 127 (03) :293-300