Impact of PV system orientation angle accuracy on greenhouse gases mitigation

被引:21
作者
Ahmed, Waqas [1 ]
Sheikh, Jamil Ahmed [2 ]
Ahmad, Salman [1 ]
Farjana, Shahjadi Hisan [3 ]
Mahmud, M. A. Parvez [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wah, Wah Engn Coll, Dept Elect Engn, Wah Cantt 47040, Pakistan
[2] Univ Wah, Dept Sociol, Wah Cantt 47040, Pakistan
[3] Univ Melbourne, Dept Mech Engn, Melbourne, Vic 3053, Australia
[4] Deakin Univ, Sch Engn, Geelong, Vic 3216, Australia
关键词
PV system; Tilt angle; Azimuth angle; GHG mitigation; OPTIMUM TILT ANGLE; SOLAR-ENERGY; OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.csite.2020.100815
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Sun, a free source of energy, has moved the world to consider photovoltaic (PV) system as green renewable energy since fossil fuel power plant accounts for a significant share of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions across the globe. The output of the PV system is limited to many factors; however, the acute accuracy of orientation (tilt and azimuth) angles exposes the PV surfaces to high doses of solar radiations. Which increases the PV system output; in turn GHG mitigation potential. This paper draws a relationship between accuracy of orientation angles impact on PV system's GHG mitigation potential. For reference, the accuracy of orientation angles in Pakistan's Capital increases the annual average daily solar radiations level from 4.02 (horizontal surface) to 4.39 (-33.6 tilt and 180 azimuth) kWh/m2/d. Accuracy of orientation angles on multiple end energy users (equivalent to 1 MW) PV system has potential to avoid additional 65.1 and 22.6 tonnes of CO2 equivalent and production of 158987.13 and 55,120.1 kW h compared with a same size PV system with horizontal surface and 33.6 tilt angle (equivalent to location's latitude), respectively. PV system orientation angles accuracy has the potential to avoid tonnes of GHG emissions without any investment, operation and maintenance costs.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Ahmed W., 2020, TECHNOECONOMIC ANAL
[2]   The Role of Single End-Users and Producers on GHG Mitigation in Pakistan-A Case Study [J].
Ahmed, Waqas ;
Sheikh, Jamil Ahmed ;
Kouzani, Abbas Z. ;
Mahmud, M. A. Parvez .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (20) :1-12
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, RETScreen Software Online User Manual
[4]   The underestimated potential of solar energy to mitigate climate change [J].
Creutzig, Felix ;
Agoston, Peter ;
Goldschmidt, Jan Christoph ;
Luderer, Gunnar ;
Nemet, Gregory ;
Pietzcker, Robert C. .
NATURE ENERGY, 2017, 2 (09)
[5]   The environmental and economic analysis of grid-connected photovoltaic power systems with silicon solar panels, in accord with the new energy policy in Iran [J].
Farangi, Mostafa ;
Soleimani, Ebrahim Asl ;
Zahedifar, Mostafa ;
Amiri, Omid ;
Poursafar, Jafar .
ENERGY, 2020, 202
[6]   Solar Energy Development in Pakistan: Barriers and Policy Recommendations [J].
Irfan, Muhammad ;
Zhao, Zhen-Yu ;
Ahmad, Munir ;
Mukeshimana, Marie Claire .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (04)
[7]   Solar energy: Potential and future prospects [J].
Kabir, Ehsanul ;
Kumar, Pawan ;
Kumar, Sandeep ;
Adelodun, Adedeji A. ;
Kim, Ki-Hyun .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2018, 82 :894-900
[8]   On the estimation of the optimum tilt angle of PV panel in Saudi Arabia [J].
Kaddoura, Tarek O. ;
Ramli, Makbul A. M. ;
Al-Turki, Yusuf A. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 65 :626-634
[9]   Solar energy for future world: - A review [J].
Kannan, Nadarajah ;
Vakeesan, Divagar .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 62 :1092-1105
[10]   Optimization of the Tilt Angle of Solar Panels for Malaysia [J].
Khatib, T. ;
Mohamed, A. ;
Mahmoud, M. ;
Sopian, K. .
ENERGY SOURCES PART A-RECOVERY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, 2015, 37 (06) :606-613