Action research is similar to design science

被引:142
作者
Jarvinen, Pertti [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tampere, Dept Comp Sci, FIN-330014 Tampere, Finland
关键词
action research; design science; research method; qualitative method; INFORMATION-SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1007/s11135-005-5427-1
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
In management information systems (MIS) action research is long considered as promising but low-level research approach. It has an utmost relevance because action researchers are working with practitioners to solve the important practical problem. Design science outlined some years ago is just winning a wider audience. Action research was traditionally classified into qualitative research methods. But it seems to be the "wrong" home of action research. We shall show that after comparison of the seven aspects: concrete results of the study, knowledge produced, activities, the intent and the nature of a study, the division of labor in a study and generation, use and test of knowledge, the concordance between the characteristics of action research on the one hand and of design science on the other hand is very good. Hence, action research and design science should next be considered as similar research approaches, and this is a turning point in the history of both action research and design science.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 54
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Design Science Research for Business Process Design: Organizational Transition at Intersport Sweden
    Lind, Mikael
    Rudmark, Daniel
    Seigerroth, Ulf
    [J]. HUMAN BENEFIT THROUGH THE DIFFUSION OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS DESIGN SCIENCE RESEARCH, 2010, 318 : 159 - +
  • [22] Design science research genres: introduction to the special issue on exemplars and criteria for applicable design science research
    Peffers, Ken
    Tuunanen, Tuure
    Niehaves, Bjoern
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2018, 27 (02) : 129 - 139
  • [23] How Relevant is Fieldwork to DSS Design-Science Research?
    Arnott, David
    Pervan, Graham
    [J]. BRIDGING THE SOCIO-TECHNICAL GAP IN DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS: CHALLENGES FOR THE NEXT DECADE, 2010, 212 : 108 - 119
  • [24] Pragmatizing the Normative Artifact: Design Science Research in Scandinavia and Beyond
    Agerfalk, Par J.
    Wiberg, Mikael
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2018, 43 (43): : 68 - 77
  • [25] Design Science Research Demonstrators for Punctuation - The Establishment of a Service Ecosystem
    Rudmark, Daniel
    Lind, Mikael
    [J]. SERVICE-ORIENTED PERSPECTIVES IN DESIGN SCIENCE RESEARCH: 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE, 2011, 6629 : 153 - 165
  • [26] The ethics of action research participation
    Davison, Robert M.
    Martinsons, Maris G.
    Wong, Louie H. M.
    [J]. INFORMATION SYSTEMS JOURNAL, 2022, 32 (03) : 573 - 594
  • [27] Promoting quality for teacher action research: lessons learned from science teachers' action research
    Capobianco, Brenda M.
    Feldman, Allan
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL ACTION RESEARCH, 2006, 14 (04) : 497 - 512
  • [28] Organizational Design of Innovative Education - Insights from a Combined Design and Action Research Project
    Marjanovic, Olivera
    [J]. DESIGN SCIENCE AT THE INTERSECTION OF PHYSICAL AND VIRTUAL DESIGN, 2013, 7939 : 212 - 227
  • [29] Critical design ethnography as action research
    Reason, P
    [J]. ANTHROPOLOGY & EDUCATION QUARTERLY, 2004, 35 (02) : 269 - 276
  • [30] A Conceptual Model for Action and Design Research
    Henriques, Telmo Antonio
    O'Neill, Henrique
    [J]. COMPUTER SUPPORTED QUALITATIVE RESEARCH: NEW TRENDS ON QUALITATIVE RESEARCH, 2019, 861 : 186 - 201