Legal abortion for mental health indications

被引:20
作者
Cook, R. J.
Ortega-Ortiz, A.
Romans, S.
Ross, L. E.
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Fac Law, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Fac Med, Ctr Res Womens Hlth, Shirley Brown Chair Womens Mental Hlth Res, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Joint Ctr Bioeth, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Fac Law, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
[5] Univ Toronto, Fac Med, Dept Psychiat, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
关键词
therapeutic abortion; abortion on mental health grounds; mental health grounds for abortion; psychiatric grounds for abortion; abortion assessments; legal grounds for abortion; fetal deformity;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.07.002
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Where legal systems allow therapeutic abortion to preserve women's mental health, practitioners often lack access to mental health professionals for making critical diagnoses or prognoses that pregnancy or childcare endangers patients' mental health. Practitioners themselves must then make clinical assessments of the impact on their patients of continued pregnancy or childcare. The law requires only that practitioners make assessments in good faith, and by credible criteria. Mental disorder includes psychological distress or mental suffering due to unwanted pregnancy and responsibility for childcare, or, for instance, anticipated serious fetal impairment. Account should be taken of factors that make patients vulnerable to distress, such as personal or family mental health history, factors that may precipitate mental distress, such as loss of personal relationships, and factors that may maintain distress, such as poor education and marginal social status. Some characteristics of patients may operate as both precipitating and maintaining factors, such as poverty and lack of social support. (c) 2006 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:185 / 190
页数:6
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1994, AM PSYCHIATR ASSOC
[2]   The biopsychosocial model 25 years later:: Principles, practice, and scientific inquiry [J].
Borrell-Carrió, F ;
Suchman, AL ;
Epstein, RM .
ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2004, 2 (06) :576-582
[3]  
BURT VK, 1999, TXB PSYCHIAT, P1429
[4]  
*CTR REPR RIGHTS, 2006, WORLDS AB LAWS FACT, P1
[5]   The scope and limits of conscientious objection [J].
Dickens, BM ;
Cook, RJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2000, 71 (01) :71-77
[6]   Conflict of interest: Legal and ethical aspects [J].
Dickens, BM ;
Cook, RJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2006, 92 (02) :192-197
[7]  
ENGEL GL, 1980, AM J PSYCHIAT, V137, P535
[8]  
Kaplan P, 2006, NEUROLOGIC DIS WOMEN
[9]  
MCGRAW R B, 1956, N Y State J Med, V56, P1605
[10]  
Montgomery J., 2006, Legal Studies, V26, P185