Bifidelity Surrogate Modelling: Showcasing the Need for New Test Instances

被引:5
作者
Andres-Thio, Nicolau [1 ]
Munoz, Mario Andres [1 ]
Smith-Miles, Kate [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Sch Math & Stat, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
surrogate modelling; expensive black-box; Co-Kriging; Kriging; multifidelity; GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION; HIGH-FIDELITY; ALGORITHMS;
D O I
10.1287/ijoc.2022.1217
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
In recent years, multifidelity expensive black-box (Mf-EBB) methods have received increasing attention due to their strong applicability to industrial design problems. The challenge, however, is that knowledge of the relationship between decisions and objective values is limited to a small set of sample observations of variable quality. In the field of Mf-EBB, a problem instance consists of an expensive yet accurate source of information, and one or more cheap yet less accurate sources of information. The field aims to provide techniques either to accurately explain how decisions affect design outcome, or to find the best decisions to optimise design outcomes. Many techniques that use surrogate models have been developed to provide solutions to both aims. Only in recent years, however, have researchers begun to explore the conditions under which these new techniques are reliable, often focusing on problems with a single low-fidelity function, known as bifidelity expensive black-box (Bf-EBB) problems. This study extends the existing Bf-EBB test instances found in the literature, as well as the features used to determine when the low-fidelity information source should be used. A literature test suite is constructed and augmented with new instances to demonstrate the potentially misleading results that could be reached using only the instances currently found in the literature, and to expose the criticality of a more heterogeneous test suite for algorithm assessment. Addressing the shortcomings of the existing literature, a new set of features is presented, as well as a new instance creation procedure, and a study of their impact on algorithm assessment is conducted. The low-fidelity information source is shown to be valuable if it is often locally accurate, even when its overall accuracy is relatively low. This contradicts the existing literature guidelines, which indicate the low-fidelity information is only useful if it has a high overall accuracy.
引用
收藏
页码:3007 / 3022
页数:16
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] A Response Surface Approach to Beam Orientation Optimization in Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning
    Aleman, Dionne M.
    Romeijn, H. Edwin
    Dempsey, James F.
    [J]. INFORMS JOURNAL ON COMPUTING, 2009, 21 (01) : 62 - 76
  • [2] Andres-Thio Nicolau, 2022, Zenodo, DOI 10.5281/ZENODO.6208147
  • [3] Andres-Thio Nicolau, 2022, Figshare, DOI 10.6084/m9.figshare.19196594.v1
  • [4] Multi-fidelity information fusion based on prediction of kriging
    Dong, Huachao
    Song, Baowei
    Wang, Peng
    Huang, Shuai
    [J]. STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2015, 51 (06) : 1267 - 1280
  • [5] Duchon J., 1977, CONSTRUCTIVE THEORY, P8
  • [6] Multifidelity surrogate modeling based on radial basis functions
    Durantin, Cedric
    Rouxel, Justin
    Desideri, Jean-Antoine
    Gliere, Alain
    [J]. STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2017, 56 (05) : 1061 - 1075
  • [7] Issues in Deciding Whether to Use Multifidelity Surrogates
    Fernandez-Godino, M. Giselle
    Park, Chanyoung
    Kim, Nam H.
    Haftka, Raphael T.
    [J]. AIAA JOURNAL, 2019, 57 (05) : 2039 - 2054
  • [8] Multi-fidelity optimization via surrogate modelling
    Forrester, Alexander I. J.
    Sobester, Andras
    Keane, Andy J.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2007, 463 (2088): : 3251 - 3269
  • [9] Black-box calibration for complex-system simulation
    Forrester, Alexander I. J.
    [J]. PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2010, 368 (1924): : 3567 - 3579
  • [10] Frangioni Antonio, 2022, Zenodo, DOI 10.5281/ZENODO.6578060