Responses of dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) to sulfentrazone

被引:13
|
作者
Hekmat, Sharareh [1 ]
Shropshire, Christy
Soltani, Nader
Sikkema, Peter H.
机构
[1] Univ Western Ontario, Brescia Univ Coll, London, ON N6G 1H2, Canada
[2] Univ Guelph, Ridgetown, ON N0P 2C0, Canada
关键词
crop injury; dry bean; Phascolus vulgaris; pre-emergence; sensitivity; tolerance yield;
D O I
10.1016/j.cropro.2006.05.002
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
There is little information on the sensitivity of dry beans to sulfentrazone. Tolerance of eight cultivars of dry beans representing eight market classes (black, brown, cranberry, kidney, otebo, pinto, white and yellow eye beans) to the pre-emergence (PRE) application of sulfentrazone at the dose of 420 and 840 g a.i. ha(-1) was studied at two locations (Exeter and Ridgetown, ON, Canada) in 2004 and 2005. Market classes of dry beans differed in their response to sulfentrazone. Sulfentrazone applied PRE at 420 g ha(-1) caused 7-12% visual crop injury but there was no decrease in height, dry weight and yield of any market class of dry beans. Sulfentrazone applied PRE at 840 g ha(-1) caused up to 30% visual crop injury and decreased dry weight 30-40% of all market classes of dry beans with the exception of brown and pinto beans. There was no decrease in height of dry beans due to the PRE application of sulfentrazone. Sulfentrazone at the high dose reduced the yield of black, cranberry, otebo and white beans by 47, 44, 26 and 52%, respectively. There was no decrease in yield of brown, kidney, pinto and yellow eye beans. Seed moisture content measured at harvest ranged from 18.1 to 22.7% for various market classes of dry beans and was not affected by the application of sulfentrazone. Based on these results, brown and pinto beans had the greatest tolerance to the PRE application of sulfentrazone. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:525 / 529
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] SIMULATION OF THE RESPONSES OF DRY BEANS (PHASEOLUS VULGARIS L.) TO IRRIGATION
    Espadafor, M.
    Couto, L.
    Resende, M.
    Henderson, D. W.
    Garcia-Vila, M.
    Fereres, E.
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASABE, 2017, 60 (06) : 1983 - 1994
  • [2] Responses of various market classes of dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) to linuron
    Soltani, N
    Shropshire, C
    Sikkema, PH
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 20 (01) : 118 - 122
  • [3] Volatile compounds of dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
    Oomah, B. Dave
    Liang, Lisa S. Y.
    Balasubramanian, Parthiba
    PLANT FOODS FOR HUMAN NUTRITION, 2007, 62 (04) : 177 - 183
  • [4] Volatile Compounds of Dry Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
    B. Dave Oomah
    Lisa S. Y. Liang
    Parthiba Balasubramanian
    Plant Foods for Human Nutrition, 2007, 62
  • [5] Nutritional and protein quality of dry Brazilian beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
    Rezende, Amanda Alves
    Bertoldo Pacheco, Maria Teresa
    Nunes da Silva, Vera Sonia
    Pinto de Castro Ferreira, Tania Aparecida
    FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 38 (03): : 421 - 427
  • [6] Conversion of starch from dry common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) to ethanol
    Nichols, Nancy N.
    Sutivisedsak, Nongnuch
    Dien, Bruce S.
    Biswas, Atanu
    Lesch, William C.
    Cotta, Michael A.
    INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS, 2011, 33 (03) : 644 - 647
  • [7] Rapid tests to assess the antioxidant activity of Phaseolus vulgaris L. dry beans
    Heimler, D
    Vignolini, P
    Dini, MG
    Romani, A
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2005, 53 (08) : 3053 - 3056
  • [8] Antioxidant potential of beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.).
    Madhujith, T
    Amarowicz, R
    Shahidi, F
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2003, 226 : U63 - U63
  • [9] Oxidative stress responses in beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L)
    Sheinberg, O
    Rubin, B
    Rabinowich, HD
    TelOr, E
    PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1996, 111 (02) : 246 - 246