Towards Industrialization of FOPID Controllers: A Survey on Milestones of Fractional-Order Control and Pathways for Future Developments

被引:115
作者
Tepljakov, Aleksei [1 ]
Alagoz, Baris Baykant [2 ]
Yeroglu, Celaleddin [2 ]
Gonzalez, Emmanuel A. [3 ]
Hosseinnia, S. Hassan [4 ]
Petlenkov, Eduard [1 ]
Ates, Abdullah [2 ]
Cech, Martin [5 ]
机构
[1] Tallinn Univ Technol, Dept Comp Syst, EE-12618 Tallinn, Estonia
[2] Inonu Univ, Dept Comp Engn, TR-44000 Malatya, Turkey
[3] Schindler Elevator Corp, Holland, OH 43528 USA
[4] Delft Univ Technol, Dept Precis & Microsyst Engn, NL-2628 Delft, Netherlands
[5] Univ West Bohemia NTIS, European Ctr Excellence, Plzen 30100, Czech Republic
关键词
Patents; Technological innovation; Process control; Tools; Control systems; PD control; Tuning; Fractional calculus; fractional-order PID control; industrial applications; frequency-domain analysis; optimal tuning; fractional control implementation; LIGHTING CONTROL STRATEGY; PID CONTROLLERS; ROBUST STABILITY; (PID-MU)-D-LAMBDA CONTROLLER; OPTIMIZATION ALGORITHM; ANALOG IMPLEMENTATION; CONTROL DESIGN; TUNING RULES; SYSTEMS; STABILIZATION;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3055117
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The interest in fractional-order (FO) control can be traced back to the late nineteenth century. The growing tendency towards using fractional-order proportional-integral-derivative (FOPID) control has been fueled mainly by the fact that these controllers have additional "tuning knobs" that allow coherent adjustment of the dynamics of control systems. For instance, in certain cases, the capacity for additional frequency response shaping gives rise to the generation of control laws that lead to superior performance of control loops. These fractional-order control laws may allow fulfilling intricate control performance requirements that are otherwise not in the span of conventional integer-order control systems. However, there are underpinning points that are rarely addressed in the literature: (1) What are the particular advantages (in concrete figures) of FOPID controllers versus conventional, integer-order (IO) PID controllers in light of the complexities arising in the implementation of the former? (2) For real-time implementation of FOPID controllers, approximations are used that are indeed equivalent to high-order linear controllers. What, then, is the benefit of using FOPID controllers? Finally, (3) What advantages are to be had from having a near-ideal fractional-order behavior in control practice? In the present paper, we attempt to address these issues by reviewing a large portion of relevant publications in the fast-growing FO control literature, outline the milestones and drawbacks, and present future perspectives for industrialization of fractional-order control. Furthermore, we comment on FOPID controller tuning methods from the perspective of seeking globally optimal tuning parameter sets and how this approach can benefit designers of industrial FOPID control. We also review some CACSD (computer-aided control system design) software toolboxes used for the design and implementation of FOPID controllers. Finally, we draw conclusions and formulate suggestions for future research.
引用
收藏
页码:21016 / 21042
页数:27
相关论文
共 214 条
  • [11] Aldair A., INT J CONTROL AUTOM, V3, P33
  • [12] Almadhoun M., 2016, U.S. Patent, Patent No. [US 9 305 706, 9305706]
  • [13] [Anonymous], 2017, INAE Lett, DOI DOI 10.1007/S41403-017-0020-1
  • [14] [Anonymous], 2009, HDB PI PID CONTROLLE, DOI DOI 10.1142/P575
  • [15] [Anonymous], 2004, P FRACT DIFF APPL
  • [16] [Anonymous], 2000, Fractional Calculus and Applied Analysis
  • [17] [Anonymous], 2013, IFAC P, DOI DOI 10.3182/20130204-3-FR-4032.00191
  • [18] [Anonymous], 2008, IFAC P
  • [19] Optimal fractional order PID for a robotic manipulator using colliding bodies design
    Asl, Reza Mohammadi
    Pourabdollah, Elham
    Salmani, Milad
    [J]. SOFT COMPUTING, 2018, 22 (14) : 4647 - 4659
  • [20] Astrom K., 2005, Advanced PID Control