Is Compliance With Guideline Recommended Follow-Up After Aortic Dissection Associated With Survival?

BACKGROUND Patients with acute aortic dissection (AD) remain at risk for long-term complications and thus are recommended to adhere closely to American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association aorta guideline based follow-up imaging and clinic visits. The long-term outcomes of compliance with such a model are not well understood.METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study of patients at a regional AD center who survived hospital discharge for AD and who were analyzed by compliance with initial follow-up at 3 months and long term after AD. The primary end point was death.RESULTS A total of 172 (66% type A; 33% type B) patients survived hospitalization and were followed up over 48 months (interquartile range [IQR], 21, 88 months). Of these patients, 122 (71%) attended the first follow-up appointment, and 90 (52%) attended more than two-thirds of recommended appointments. Patients who attended the first follow-up visit had improved long-term follow-up compliance (75% [IQR, 50%, 91%]) compared with patients who did not attend the first visit (18% [IQR, 0%, 57%]). Noncompliance with the scheduled long-term follow-up was associated with a 50% increase in the risk of death (hazard ratio, 1.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.2, 2.1; P < .001). Furthermore, in patients with low compliance (consistently attending less than one-third of follow-up appointments), the lifetime risk of death after AD was more than double that of patients with high compliance (consistently attending more than two-thirds of appointments) (hazard ratio, 2.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.5, 3.1; P < .001).CONCLUSIONS Nearly one-third of patients with AD do not attend the first recommended follow-up visit, and such failure was associated with later noncompliance with subsequent follow-up. Low-compliant patients have double the lifetime risk of death after AD than do high-compliant patients.