Explaining Unfair Offers in Ultimatum Games and their Effects on Trust: An Experimental Approach

被引:33
作者
De Cremer, David [1 ,2 ,3 ]
van Dijk, Eric
Pillutla, Madan M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Rotterdam Sch Management, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus Ctr Behav Eth, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] London Business Sch, London, England
关键词
ETHICAL DECISION-MAKING; APOLOGY; FAIRNESS; INFORMATION; ORGANIZATIONS; UNCERTAINTY;
D O I
10.5840/beq20102018
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Unfair offers in bargaining may have disruptive effects because they may reduce interpersonal trust. In such situations future trust may be strongly affected by social accounts (i.e., apologies vs. denials). In the current paper we investigate when people are most likely to demand social accounts for the unfair offer (Experiment 1), and when social accounts will have the highest impact (Experiment 2). We hypothesized that the need for and impact of social accounts will be highest when the intentions of the other party are uncertain. The results provided support for this reasoning.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 126
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]  
Moore DA, 2006, ACAD MANAGE REV, V31, P10
[32]   APOLOGY AS AGGRESSION CONTROL - ITS ROLE IN MEDIATING APPRAISAL OF AND RESPONSE TO HARM [J].
OHBUCHI, K ;
KAMEDA, M ;
AGARIE, N .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1989, 56 (02) :219-227
[33]   THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ACCOUNTS FOLLOWING TRANSGRESSION [J].
RIORDAN, CA ;
MARLIN, NA ;
KELLOGG, RT .
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY, 1983, 46 (03) :213-219
[34]   THE ROLE OF INFORMATION IN BARGAINING - AN EXPERIMENTAL-STUDY [J].
ROTH, AE ;
MURNIGHAN, JK .
ECONOMETRICA, 1982, 50 (05) :1123-1142
[35]   Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust [J].
Rousseau, DM ;
Sitkin, SB ;
Burt, RS ;
Camerer, C .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1998, 23 (03) :393-404
[36]   How effective are the things people say to apologize? Effects of the realization of the apology speech act [J].
Scher, SJ ;
Darley, JM .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLINGUISTIC RESEARCH, 1997, 26 (01) :127-140
[37]  
Schlenker B.R., 1980, IMPRESSION MANAGEMEN
[38]   Promises and lies: Restoring violated trust [J].
Schweitzer, Maurice E. ;
Hershey, John C. ;
Bradlow, Eric T. .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2006, 101 (01) :1-19
[39]   To justify or excuse?: A meta-analytic review of the effects of explanations [J].
Shaw, JC ;
Wild, E ;
Colquitt, JA .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 88 (03) :444-458
[40]   FACTORS AFFECTING PERCEPTIONS OF POLITICAL CANDIDATES ACCUSED OF SEXUAL AND FINANCIAL MISCONDUCT [J].
SIGAL, J ;
HSU, L ;
FOODIM, S ;
BETMAN, J .
POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1988, 9 (02) :273-280