Explaining Unfair Offers in Ultimatum Games and their Effects on Trust: An Experimental Approach

被引:33
作者
De Cremer, David [1 ,2 ,3 ]
van Dijk, Eric
Pillutla, Madan M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Rotterdam Sch Management, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus Ctr Behav Eth, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] London Business Sch, London, England
关键词
ETHICAL DECISION-MAKING; APOLOGY; FAIRNESS; INFORMATION; ORGANIZATIONS; UNCERTAINTY;
D O I
10.5840/beq20102018
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Unfair offers in bargaining may have disruptive effects because they may reduce interpersonal trust. In such situations future trust may be strongly affected by social accounts (i.e., apologies vs. denials). In the current paper we investigate when people are most likely to demand social accounts for the unfair offer (Experiment 1), and when social accounts will have the highest impact (Experiment 2). We hypothesized that the need for and impact of social accounts will be highest when the intentions of the other party are uncertain. The results provided support for this reasoning.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 126
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], HARVARD BUSINESS REV
[2]  
[Anonymous], WHAT MOTIVATES FAIRN
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1993, Psychol. Perspect. Justice, DOI [10.1017/CBO9780511552069.003, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511552069.003]
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1996, TRUST ORG FRONTIERS
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Social Beings: Core Motives in Social Psychology
[6]  
BIES RJ, 1987, RES ORGAN BEHAV, V9, P289
[7]   When talk is not cheap: Substantive penance and expressions of intent in rebuilding cooperation [J].
Bottom, WP ;
Gibson, K ;
Daniels, SE ;
Murnighan, JK .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2002, 13 (05) :497-513
[8]  
Buchanan A., 1997, MED ETHICS, P321
[9]  
CAMERER C, 1995, J ECON PERSPECT, V9, P109
[10]   PSYCHOLOGICAL SOURCES OF AMBIGUITY AVOIDANCE [J].
CURLEY, SP ;
YATES, JF ;
ABRAMS, RA .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1986, 38 (02) :230-256