Predictive information speeds up visual awareness in an individuation task by modulating threshold setting, not processing efficiency

被引:14
作者
De Loof, Esther [1 ]
Van Opstal, Filip [2 ,3 ]
Verguts, Tom [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Dept Expt Psychol, Henri Dunantlaan 2, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Univ Libre Bruxelles, CRCN, Brussels, Belgium
[3] UNI, Brussels, Belgium
关键词
Visual awareness; Individuation; Identification; Drift diffusion model; Predictive information; Awareness threshold; DIFFUSION-MODEL; NEURAL MECHANISMS; SPATIAL ATTENTION; PRIOR PROBABILITY; CONSCIOUSNESS; EXPECTATION; PERCEPTION; RESPONSES; ACCESS; BRAIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.visres.2016.03.002
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Theories on visual awareness claim that predicted stimuli reach awareness faster than unpredicted ones. In the current study, we disentangle whether prior information about the upcoming stimulus affects visual awareness of stimulus location (i.e., individuation) by modulating processing efficiency or threshold setting. Analogous research on stimulus identification revealed that prior information modulates threshold setting. However, as identification and individuation are two functionally and neurally distinct processes, the mechanisms underlying identification cannot simply be extrapolated directly to individuation. The goal of this study was therefore to investigate how individuation is influenced by prior information about the upcoming stimulus. To do so, a drift diffusion model was fitted to estimate the processing efficiency and threshold setting for predicted versus unpredicted stimuli in a cued individuation paradigm. Participants were asked to locate a picture, following a cue that was congruent, incongruent or neutral with respect to the picture's identity. Pictures were individuated faster in the congruent and neutral condition compared to the incongruent condition. In the diffusion model analysis, the processing efficiency was not significantly different across conditions. However, the threshold setting was significantly higher following an incongruent cue compared to both congruent and neutral cues. Our results indicate that predictive information about the upcoming stimulus influences visual awareness by shifting the threshold for individuation rather than by enhancing processing efficiency. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:104 / 112
页数:9
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   Evaluating comparative and equality judgments in contrast perception: Attention alters appearance [J].
Anton-Erxleben, Katharina ;
Abrams, Jared ;
Carrasco, Marisa .
JOURNAL OF VISION, 2010, 10 (11) :1-22
[2]   Neural mechanisms of visual attention: Object-based selection of a region in space [J].
Arrington, CM ;
Carr, TH ;
Mayer, AR ;
Rao, SM .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2000, 12 :106-117
[3]  
BAARS BJ, 1994, CONSCIOUSNESS IN PHILOSOPHY AND COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, P149
[4]   The psychophysics toolbox [J].
Brainard, DH .
SPATIAL VISION, 1997, 10 (04) :433-436
[5]   Spontaneous EEG oscillations reveal periodic sampling of visual attention [J].
Busch, Niko A. ;
VanRullen, Rufin .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2010, 107 (37) :16048-16053
[6]   Not all features are created equal: Processing asymmetries between location and object features [J].
Chen, Zhe .
VISION RESEARCH, 2009, 49 (11) :1481-1491
[7]   Attentional routes to conscious perception [J].
Chica, Ana B. ;
Bartolomeo, Paolo .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 3
[8]   Spatial attention and conscious perception: the role of endogenous and exogenous orienting [J].
Chica, Ana B. ;
Lasaponara, Stefano ;
Chanes, Lorena ;
Valero-Cabre, Antoni ;
Doricchi, Fabrizio ;
Lupianez, Juan ;
Bartolomeo, Paolo .
ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2011, 73 (04) :1065-1081
[9]   Distinct mechanisms subserve location- and object-based visual attention [J].
Chou, Wei-Lun ;
Yeh, Su-Ling ;
Chen, Chien-Chung .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 5
[10]   Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science [J].
Clark, Andy .
BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 2013, 36 (03) :181-204