The evaluation of Rolimeter, KLT, KiRA and KT-1000 arthrometer in healthy individuals shows acceptable intra-rater but poor inter-rater reliability in the measurement of anterior tibial knee translation

被引:24
|
作者
Runer, Armin [1 ]
di Sarsina, Tommaso Roberti [2 ]
Starke, Vasco [3 ]
Iltchev, Alessandra [3 ]
Felmet, Gernot [4 ]
Braun, Sepp [5 ,6 ]
Fink, Christian [5 ,6 ]
Csapo, Robert [6 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Innsbruck, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, Innsbruck, Austria
[2] Ist Ortoped Rizzoli, Clin Ortoped & Traumatol, Bologna, Italy
[3] Med Univ Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
[4] Orthopad Praxis & ARTICO Sportklin, Schwenningen, Germany
[5] Gelenkpunkt Sports & Joint Surg, Innsbruck, Austria
[6] Private Univ Hlth Sci, Res Unit Orthopaed Sports Med & Injury Prevent, ISAG, Med Informat & Technol, Innsbruck, Austria
关键词
Knee arthrometer; Anterior cruciate ligament; ACL anterior tibial translation; Side-to-side difference; Equivalence testing; Lachman Test; Rolimeter; KiRA; KLT; KT1000;
D O I
10.1007/s00167-021-06540-9
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose To assess measurement equivalence, inter- and intra-rater reliability, standard error of measurements (SEM) and false positive measurements (FPM) of four different knee arthrometers (KLT,Karl Storz; KiRA, I + ; KT-1000 MEDmetric Corp; Rolimeter, Aircast) in healthy patients. Methods Four different investigators (two advanced (AR) and two beginners (BR)) examined 12 participants with healthy knees at two time points with regards to anterior tibial translation (ATT) and side-to-side difference (SSD). Test equivalence was assessed using the TOST (two-one-sided t test) procedure with +/- 1 mm equivalence boundaries. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated using two-way mixed effects models. Furthermore, false positive-(SSD > 3 mm) and SEMs were assessed. Results A total of 2304 Lachman Tests were performed. Between-rater SSDs were equivalent between AR and BR raters for the Rolimeter only. Inter-rater ICC values (SSD, ATT) were graded as "poor" to "moderate" for all devices. Equivalent test-retest results were observed for all raters using the Rolimeter, KLT and KT-1000, whereas measurement consistency with KiRA was given in the advanced examiners group only. Intra-rater ICC values (Range: SSD, ATT) were graded as "poor" to "moderate" for SSD values and "moderate" to "good" for ATT. SEMs were lowest for the Rolimeter and highest for KiRA. FPM were never obtained with the Rolimeter (0%), twice (2.1%) with the KT-1000, three times (3.1%) with the KLT and 33 times (34.4%) using KiRA. Conclusion There is acceptable intra-rater but poor inter-rater reliability with all tested arthrometers. Measures of knee laxity are comparable between Rolimeter, KLT and KT-1000 but higher for KiRA. Clinically, the present study shows that repeated arthrometry measurements should always be performed by the same investigators.
引用
收藏
页码:2717 / 2726
页数:10
相关论文
共 1 条
  • [1] The evaluation of Rolimeter, KLT, KiRA and KT-1000 arthrometer in healthy individuals shows acceptable intra-rater but poor inter-rater reliability in the measurement of anterior tibial knee translation
    Armin Runer
    Tommaso Roberti di Sarsina
    Vasco Starke
    Alessandra Iltchev
    Gernot Felmet
    Sepp Braun
    Christian Fink
    Robert Csapo
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2021, 29 : 2717 - 2726